AMSC vs. LRCX
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). Over the past 10 years, AMSC returned 17.27%/yr vs 46.35%/yr for LRCX. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 50.59% return, which is significantly lower than LRCX's 89.76% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has underperformed LRCX with an annualized return of 17.27%, while LRCX has yielded a comparatively higher 46.35% annualized return.
AMSC
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- 50.59%
- 6M
- 33.52%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 91.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
LRCX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 89.76%
- 6M
- 99.61%
- 1Y
- 278.49%
- 3Y*
- 76.58%
- 5Y*
- 40.10%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
AMSC vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 50.59% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 207.16% | -50.75% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 89.76% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and LRCX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1991 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, AMSC and LRCX have become more correlated (0.48) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$2.03B
LRCX:
$409.71B
AMSC:
$3.05
LRCX:
$5.29
AMSC:
14.22
LRCX:
61.36
AMSC:
0.03
LRCX:
4.64
AMSC:
6.36
LRCX:
18.98
AMSC:
3.65
LRCX:
38.71
AMSC:
$299.15M
LRCX:
$21.68B
AMSC:
$91.38M
LRCX:
$10.84B
AMSC:
$19.29M
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
LRCX
AMSC vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMSC | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.60 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 14.02 | -13.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 47.19 | -46.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMSC | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 5.46 | -5.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.87 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 1.04 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.43 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than LRCX's maximum drawdown of -87.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and LRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -87.90% | -11.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -20.01% | -41.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -47.10% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -56.39% | -26.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -56.39% | -32.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.74% | -5.60% | -88.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.76% | -28.18% | -47.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.14% | 5.93% | +30.21% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 21.83% compared to Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) at 18.51%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.83% | 18.51% | +3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.09% | 42.13% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.36% | 51.52% | +33.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.23% | 46.25% | +40.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.09% | 44.76% | +34.33% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.31% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
AMSC vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMSC vs. LRCX - Profitability Comparison
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and LRCX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (21.83%) compared to LRCX (18.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs LRCX's -87.90%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer