AMSC vs. LQDA
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) and LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) are both stocks. AMSC operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, AMSC returned 22.07%/yr vs 87.74%/yr for LQDA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMSC vs. LQDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 50.59% return, which is significantly lower than LQDA's 85.27% return.
AMSC
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- -21.47%
- YTD
- 50.59%
- 6M
- 33.52%
- 1Y
- 37.67%
- 3Y*
- 91.72%
- 5Y*
- 22.07%
- 10Y*
- 17.27%
LQDA
- 1D
- 3.31%
- 1M
- 51.06%
- YTD
- 85.27%
- 6M
- 82.52%
- 1Y
- 252.26%
- 3Y*
- 96.59%
- 5Y*
- 87.74%
- 10Y*
- —
AMSC vs. LQDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 50.59% | 16.85% | 121.10% | 202.72% | -66.18% | -53.54% | 198.34% | -29.60% | 120.79% |
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 85.27% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 95.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and LQDA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.21 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMSC and LQDA has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.21, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
AMSC:
$2.03B
LQDA:
$6.46B
AMSC:
$3.05
LQDA:
$0.24
AMSC:
14.22
LQDA:
267.21
AMSC:
6.36
LQDA:
20.69
AMSC:
3.65
LQDA:
59.51
AMSC:
$299.15M
LQDA:
$288.07M
AMSC:
$91.38M
LQDA:
$275.77M
AMSC:
$19.29M
LQDA:
$51.53M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. LQDA — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
LQDA
AMSC vs. LQDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Liquidia Corporation (LQDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMSC | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.46 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.62 | 7.12 | -6.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 15.88 | -14.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMSC | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 3.74 | -3.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 1.20 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.04 | 0.29 | -0.33 |
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. LQDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than LQDA's maximum drawdown of -93.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and LQDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -93.87% | -5.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -35.66% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.86% | -46.80% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | -55.36% | -27.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.74% | 0.00% | -93.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.76% | -69.65% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 36.14% | 16.05% | +20.09% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. LQDA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) is 21.83%, while Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a volatility of 28.47%. This indicates that AMSC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LQDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | LQDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.83% | 28.47% | -6.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.09% | 47.97% | +5.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 85.36% | 68.06% | +17.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.23% | 73.62% | +13.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.09% | 85.75% | -6.66% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. LQDA - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMSC nor LQDA has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMSC vs. LQDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Liquidia Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMSC vs. LQDA - Profitability Comparison
AMSC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
AMSC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
AMSC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and LQDA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDA has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to AMSC (21.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs LQDA's -93.87%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and LQDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer