PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMSC vs. ALLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMSC vs. ALLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 39.05% return, which is significantly higher than ALLT's -25.03% return. Over the past 10 years, AMSC has outperformed ALLT with an annualized return of 16.62%, while ALLT has yielded a comparatively lower 3.79% annualized return.


AMSC

1D
1.29%
1M
-26.84%
YTD
39.05%
6M
28.81%
1Y
36.35%
3Y*
76.98%
5Y*
21.40%
10Y*
16.62%

ALLT

1D
2.22%
1M
-1.47%
YTD
-25.03%
6M
-25.25%
1Y
-10.01%
3Y*
34.93%
5Y*
-17.58%
10Y*
3.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMSC vs. ALLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMSC
American Superconductor Corporation
39.05%16.85%121.10%202.72%-66.18%-53.54%198.34%-29.60%207.16%-50.75%
ALLT
Allot Communications Ltd
-25.03%65.21%260.61%-52.03%-71.04%12.93%23.76%40.03%13.88%11.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AMSC and ALLT is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2006

0.21

The correlation between AMSC and ALLT shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMSC:

$1.87B

ALLT:

$367.71M

EPS

AMSC:

$3.05

ALLT:

$0.13

PE Ratio

AMSC:

13.13

ALLT:

56.44

PEG Ratio

AMSC:

0.02

ALLT:

0.11

PS Ratio

AMSC:

5.87

ALLT:

3.21

PB Ratio

AMSC:

3.37

ALLT:

3.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMSC:

$299.15M

ALLT:

$105.27M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMSC:

$91.38M

ALLT:

$74.41M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMSC:

$19.29M

ALLT:

$10.81M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMSC vs. ALLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMSC
AMSC Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
AMSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMSC Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMSC Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

ALLT
ALLT Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
ALLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALLT Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ALLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALLT Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMSC vs. ALLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMSCALLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.03

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

-0.22

+0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.02

-0.40

+1.42

AMSC vs. ALLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is higher than the ALLT Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMSC and ALLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMSC vs. ALLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, roughly equal to the maximum ALLT drawdown of -95.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and ALLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMSCALLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.57%

-95.42%

-4.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.08%

-45.65%

-15.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.86%

-60.09%

-3.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.94%

-93.72%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.06%

-93.72%

+4.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-94.22%

-73.71%

-20.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-75.76%

-65.05%

-10.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.44%

24.83%

+11.61%

Volatility

AMSC vs. ALLT - Volatility Comparison

American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.95% compared to Allot Communications Ltd (ALLT) at 16.09%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMSCALLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.95%

16.09%

+6.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.83%

52.77%

+2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.89%

65.69%

+19.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.38%

60.78%

+26.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

79.17%

52.33%

+26.84%

Dividends

AMSC vs. ALLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMSC nor ALLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AMSC vs. ALLT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between American Superconductor Corporation and Allot Communications Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M30.00M40.00M50.00M60.00M70.00M80.00M90.00M20222023202420252026
86.41M
26.43M
(AMSC) Total Revenue
(ALLT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMSC vs. ALLT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between American Superconductor Corporation and Allot Communications Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
27.3%
70.9%
Portfolio components
AMSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 23.60M and revenue of 86.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

ALLT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a gross profit of 18.74M and revenue of 26.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.9%.

AMSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported an operating income of -522.00K and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in an operating margin of -0.6%.

ALLT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported an operating income of 1.53M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 5.8%.

AMSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, American Superconductor Corporation reported a net income of 4.53M and revenue of 86.41M, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.

ALLT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Allot Communications Ltd reported a net income of 1.94M and revenue of 26.43M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMSC and ALLT have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMSC has higher volatility (22.95%) compared to ALLT (16.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs ALLT's -95.42%.

AMSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMSC and ALLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer