PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMPS.L achieves a 6.73% return, which is significantly lower than CHRG.L's 23.07% return.


AMPS.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
6.73%
6M
9.06%
1Y
23.56%
3Y*
3.42%
5Y*
10Y*

CHRG.L

1D
-1.36%
1M
-9.26%
YTD
23.07%
6M
21.43%
1Y
83.63%
3Y*
12.82%
5Y*
3.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMPS.L
WisdomTree Battery Metals
6.73%9.11%0.72%-28.10%-10.28%
CHRG.L
WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc
23.07%44.29%-11.91%-9.67%-11.41%

Correlation

The correlation between AMPS.L and CHRG.L is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2022

0.33

The correlation between AMPS.L and CHRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (all time) to 0.43 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMPS.L
AMPS.L Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMPS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CHRG.L
CHRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) and WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMPS.LCHRG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.45

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.55

6.23

-3.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.84

18.20

-11.36

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMPS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the CHRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMPS.L and CHRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMPS.L drawdown since its inception was -40.55%, smaller than the maximum CHRG.L drawdown of -52.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMPS.L and CHRG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMPS.LCHRG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.55%

-52.64%

+12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.19%

-13.35%

+4.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.44%

-39.93%

+16.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.97%

-11.10%

-13.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.45%

-21.14%

-8.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.58%

-1.15%

Volatility

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Battery Metals (AMPS.L) is 5.29%, while WisdomTree Battery Solutions UCITS ETF - USD Acc (CHRG.L) has a volatility of 8.69%. This indicates that AMPS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMPS.LCHRG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

8.69%

-3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.44%

20.12%

-7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.91%

28.36%

-12.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

26.21%

-6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

3,147.98%

-3,128.64%

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMPS.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than CHRG.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMPS.L vs. CHRG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMPS.L nor CHRG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AMPS.L and CHRG.L have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CHRG.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CHRG.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for AMPS.L.

AMPS.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Metals Commodity, while CHRG.L tracks WisdomTree Battery Solutions Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMPS.L and 0.40% for CHRG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMPS.L and CHRG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer