PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. TDSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMOM vs. TDSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMOM vs. TDSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
-0.91%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%16.82%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
3.10%6.56%7.10%7.63%-19.67%14.81%-0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a -0.91% return, which is significantly lower than TDSC's 3.10% return.


AMOM

1D
2.17%
1M
-5.43%
YTD
-0.91%
6M
-1.05%
1Y
26.38%
3Y*
19.41%
5Y*
7.77%
10Y*

TDSC

1D
1.72%
1M
-3.72%
YTD
3.10%
6M
4.16%
1Y
6.57%
3Y*
8.26%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMOM vs. TDSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TDSC's 0.69% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. TDSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

TDSC
TDSC Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
TDSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDSC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TDSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDSC Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. TDSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMOMTDSCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.05

0.58

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.54

0.79

+0.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.13

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.13

0.62

+1.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.20

2.23

+4.97

AMOM vs. TDSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the TDSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and TDSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMTDSCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

0.58

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

0.25

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.28

+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and TDSC is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMOM vs. TDSC - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, less than TDSC's 2.17% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.09%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
TDSC
Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF
2.17%2.92%2.06%2.06%1.76%1.11%0.54%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. TDSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, which is greater than TDSC's maximum drawdown of -21.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and TDSC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMTDSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-21.51%

-18.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-12.13%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-21.51%

-18.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-3.72%

-3.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-9.65%

-1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.87%

3.39%

+0.48%

Volatility

AMOM vs. TDSC - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 8.91% compared to Cabana Target Drawdown 10 ETF (TDSC) at 3.72%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMOMTDSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.91%

3.72%

+5.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.66%

7.10%

+10.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.27%

12.43%

+12.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.52%

10.32%

+13.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.98%

10.29%

+14.69%