PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. SPVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOM vs. SPVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMOM having a 15.87% return and SPVM slightly lower at 15.18%.


AMOM

1D
0.94%
1M
-4.25%
6M
11.05%
YTD
15.87%
1Y
23.53%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
9.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.64%

SPVM

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.32%
6M
11.82%
YTD
15.18%
1Y
30.48%
3Y*
18.09%
5Y*
12.07%
10Y*
12.30%
ALL TIME*
12.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$150.21K$582.70K$376.87K
$1.04M$1.14M$1.20M

AMOM vs. SPVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
15.87%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%13.08%53.81%9.64%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
15.18%20.47%15.64%5.53%-2.10%28.86%-3.18%12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and SPVM is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2019

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between AMOM and SPVM has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AMOM vs. SPVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMOM
SPVM

Technology

56.7%
6.2%

Industrials

19.5%
9.4%

Energy

10.0%
11.8%

Basic Materials

8.2%
3.5%

Communication Services

7.4%
2.7%

Financial Services

6.2%
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.7%

Healthcare

4.5%
8.6%

Real Estate

1.9%
2.1%

Utilities

1.1%
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
3.7%

Technology

AMOM
56.7%
SPVM
6.2%

Industrials

AMOM
19.5%
SPVM
9.4%

Energy

AMOM
10.0%
SPVM
11.8%

Basic Materials

AMOM
8.2%
SPVM
3.5%

Communication Services

AMOM
7.4%
SPVM
2.7%

Financial Services

AMOM
6.2%
SPVM
36.8%

Consumer Defensive

AMOM
5.0%
SPVM
4.7%

Healthcare

AMOM
4.5%
SPVM
8.6%

Real Estate

AMOM
1.9%
SPVM
2.1%

Utilities

AMOM
1.1%
SPVM
13.4%

Consumer Cyclical

AMOM
1.1%
SPVM
3.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. SPVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

SPVM
SPVM Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SPVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SPVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPVM Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMOM vs. SPVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMOMSPVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.45

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.26

4.47

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.62

17.23

-12.61

AMOM vs. SPVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the SPVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and SPVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. SPVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum SPVM drawdown of -45.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and SPVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMSPVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-45.35%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.03%

-6.57%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-18.66%

-11.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-19.48%

-20.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.57%

-1.34%

-11.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.72%

-4.94%

-5.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.90%

1.70%

+3.20%

Volatility

AMOM vs. SPVM - Volatility Comparison

QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) has a higher volatility of 11.89% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF (SPVM) at 3.18%. This indicates that AMOM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMSPVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.89%

3.18%

+8.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.74%

7.72%

+16.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.91%

11.40%

+16.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.99%

16.57%

+8.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.59%

19.51%

+6.08%

AMOM vs. SPVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SPVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMOM vs. SPVM - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SPVM's 1.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.04%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPVM
Invesco S&P 500 Value with Momentum ETF
1.92%2.02%1.91%2.45%2.33%1.41%2.11%2.40%3.10%1.68%2.80%2.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOM and SPVM have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMOM has higher volatility (11.89%) compared to SPVM (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs SPVM's -45.35%.

On 5-year performance, SPVM leads with 12.07% vs 9.25% for AMOM. On fees, SPVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, SPVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SPVM has performed better with a 12.07% return vs 9.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

SPVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.92%, compared with 0.04% for AMOM.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.39% for SPVM.

SPVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOM and SPVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer