PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. QQQA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMOM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 27.93% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.


AMOM

1D
1.02%
1M
12.16%
YTD
27.93%
6M
28.91%
1Y
43.17%
3Y*
28.22%
5Y*
12.53%
10Y*

QQQA

1D
2.20%
1M
23.31%
YTD
65.37%
6M
67.98%
1Y
88.43%
3Y*
34.58%
5Y*
14.74%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMOM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
27.93%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%5.78%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
65.37%9.87%16.17%24.98%-29.08%8.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and QQQA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021

0.85

The correlation between AMOM and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMOM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMOM
QQQA

Technology

41.9%
65.2%

Industrials

14.5%

-

Communication Services

14.3%
13.7%

Healthcare

7.7%
7.8%

Financial Services

6.2%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.8%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%

-

Utilities

3.8%

-

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Energy

1.2%
9.1%

Technology

AMOM
41.9%
QQQA
65.2%

Industrials

AMOM
14.5%
QQQA

-

Communication Services

AMOM
14.3%
QQQA
13.7%

Healthcare

AMOM
7.7%
QQQA
7.8%

Financial Services

AMOM
6.2%
QQQA

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMOM
5.8%
QQQA
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

AMOM
5.0%
QQQA

-

Utilities

AMOM
3.8%
QQQA

-

Basic Materials

AMOM
2.7%
QQQA

-

Real Estate

AMOM
1.9%
QQQA

-

Energy

AMOM
1.2%
QQQA
9.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQA
QQQA Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QQQA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQA Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMOMQQQADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.01

3.41

-1.40

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.66

4.00

-1.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.54

-0.19

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

6.11

-2.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.88

22.85

-10.97

AMOM vs. QQQA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the QQQA Sharpe Ratio of 3.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and QQQA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMQQQADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

3.41

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.57

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.59

+0.16

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and QQQA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMQQQADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-38.44%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-14.54%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-30.84%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

-38.44%

-1.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.81%

-15.68%

+4.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

3.88%

-0.24%

Volatility

AMOM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is 7.11%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that AMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMOMQQQADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.11%

10.17%

-3.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.71%

22.18%

-5.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.58%

26.05%

-4.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.74%

25.83%

-2.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.95%

25.77%

-0.82%

AMOM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMOM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.07%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
QQQA
ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.06%0.10%0.09%0.34%0.28%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMOM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to AMOM (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs QQQA's -38.44%.

On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 12.53% for AMOM. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, AMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.

AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.

AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.58% for QQQA.

QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMOM and QQQA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer