AMOM vs. QQQA
AMOM (QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF) and QQQA (ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMOM is a Momentum fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, while QQQA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum Index - Benchmark TR Gross. AMOM is actively managed, while QQQA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMOM returned 12.53%/yr vs 14.74%/yr for QQQA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMOM charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for QQQA.
Performance
AMOM vs. QQQA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a 27.93% return, which is significantly lower than QQQA's 65.37% return.
AMOM
- 1D
- 1.02%
- 1M
- 12.16%
- YTD
- 27.93%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 43.17%
- 3Y*
- 28.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.53%
- 10Y*
- —
QQQA
- 1D
- 2.20%
- 1M
- 23.31%
- YTD
- 65.37%
- 6M
- 67.98%
- 1Y
- 88.43%
- 3Y*
- 34.58%
- 5Y*
- 14.74%
- 10Y*
- —
AMOM vs. QQQA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 27.93% | 7.69% | 35.79% | 27.06% | -26.29% | 5.78% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 65.37% | 9.87% | 16.17% | 24.98% | -29.08% | 8.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMOM and QQQA is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between AMOM and QQQA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMOM vs. QQQA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMOM
QQQA
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
Technology
AMOM
QQQA
Industrials
AMOM
QQQA
-
Communication Services
AMOM
QQQA
Healthcare
AMOM
QQQA
Financial Services
AMOM
QQQA
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMOM
QQQA
Consumer Defensive
AMOM
QQQA
-
Utilities
AMOM
QQQA
-
Basic Materials
AMOM
QQQA
-
Real Estate
AMOM
QQQA
-
Energy
AMOM
QQQA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMOM vs. QQQA — Risk / Return Rank
AMOM
QQQA
AMOM vs. QQQA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMOM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.01 | 3.41 | -1.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.66 | 4.00 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.54 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.31 | 6.11 | -2.80 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 22.85 | -10.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMOM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | 3.41 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 0.59 | +0.16 |
Drawdowns
AMOM vs. QQQA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQA drawdown of -38.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and QQQA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMOM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.68% | -38.44% | -1.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -14.54% | +1.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.26% | -30.84% | +0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.68% | -38.44% | -1.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.81% | -15.68% | +4.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 3.88% | -0.24% |
Volatility
AMOM vs. QQQA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is 7.11%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (QQQA) has a volatility of 10.17%. This indicates that AMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMOM | QQQA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.11% | 10.17% | -3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.71% | 22.18% | -5.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 26.05% | -4.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.74% | 25.83% | -2.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 25.77% | -0.82% |
AMOM vs. QQQA - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMOM vs. QQQA - Dividend Comparison
AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.07%, more than QQQA's 0.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMOM QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 0.72% | 0.74% | 24.31% | 5.51% |
QQQA ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.06% | 0.10% | 0.09% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMOM and QQQA have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQA has higher volatility (10.17%) compared to AMOM (7.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMOM dropped -39.68% vs QQQA's -38.44%.
On 5-year performance, QQQA leads with 14.74% vs 12.53% for AMOM. On fees, QQQA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, AMOM has been the lower-risk option at 7.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QQQA has performed better with a 14.74% return vs 12.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AMOM.
AMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.07%, compared with 0.06% for QQQA.
AMOM is categorized as Momentum, while QQQA is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMOM and 0.58% for QQQA.
QQQA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMOM and QQQA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer