PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMOM vs. BITQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMOM vs. BITQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMOM vs. BITQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
-3.01%7.69%35.79%27.06%-26.29%9.87%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
-5.37%18.00%46.97%246.83%-83.86%-7.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMOM achieves a -3.01% return, which is significantly higher than BITQ's -5.37% return.


AMOM

1D
4.10%
1M
-7.43%
YTD
-3.01%
6M
-2.43%
1Y
25.18%
3Y*
18.56%
5Y*
7.31%
10Y*

BITQ

1D
5.90%
1M
-4.07%
YTD
-5.37%
6M
-24.77%
1Y
55.35%
3Y*
48.69%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMOM vs. BITQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMOM has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BITQ's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMOM vs. BITQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMOM
AMOM Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMOM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
AMOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

BITQ
BITQ Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
BITQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BITQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
BITQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
BITQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
BITQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMOM vs. BITQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMOMBITQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.94

+0.06

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

1.59

-0.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.18

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

1.14

+0.80

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.59

2.59

+4.00

AMOM vs. BITQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMOM Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is comparable to the BITQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMOM and BITQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMOMBITQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.94

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

-0.05

+0.63

Correlation

The correlation between AMOM and BITQ is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AMOM vs. BITQ - Dividend Comparison

AMOM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while BITQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMOM
QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF
0.09%0.09%0.00%0.47%0.72%0.74%24.31%5.51%
BITQ
Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF
0.00%0.00%0.90%1.51%0.00%3.12%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMOM vs. BITQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMOM drawdown since its inception was -39.68%, smaller than the maximum BITQ drawdown of -90.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMOM and BITQ.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMOMBITQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.68%

-90.32%

+50.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.10%

-44.99%

+31.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.54%

-41.83%

+32.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.05%

-53.87%

+42.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

19.73%

-15.89%

Volatility

AMOM vs. BITQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for QRAFT AI-Enhanced U.S. Large Cap Momentum ETF (AMOM) is 8.79%, while Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ) has a volatility of 17.97%. This indicates that AMOM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BITQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMOMBITQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.79%

17.97%

-9.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.55%

45.99%

-28.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.18%

59.04%

-33.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.51%

67.79%

-44.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.98%

67.79%

-42.81%