PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMNA vs. SMHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMNA vs. SMHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMNA

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SMHB

1D
-1.45%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
5.72%
6M
0.84%
1Y
11.36%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
-6.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMNA vs. SMHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
0.00%0.00%44.30%12.50%20.41%36.44%2.88%
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
5.72%-7.75%-15.85%35.96%-36.03%68.86%62.56%

Correlation

The correlation between AMNA and SMHB is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.51

The correlation between AMNA and SMHB shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMNA vs. SMHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMNA

SMHB
SMHB Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SMHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMHB Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SMHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMHB Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMNA vs. SMHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B (SMHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMNA vs. SMHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMNASMHBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.10

Drawdowns

AMNA vs. SMHB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMNASMHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-90.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.38%

Volatility

AMNA vs. SMHB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMNASMHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.33%

AMNA vs. SMHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SMHB's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMNA vs. SMHB - Dividend Comparison

AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.00%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMNA
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN
0.00%0.00%4.32%5.61%5.48%5.84%2.12%0.00%0.00%
SMHB
ETRACS 2xMonthly Pay Leveraged US Small Cap High Dividend ETN Series B
21.00%22.22%21.95%15.27%24.18%12.22%16.86%19.97%0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMNA and SMHB have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMNA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMNA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for SMHB.

SMHB has the higher dividend yield at 21.00%, compared with 0.00% for AMNA.

AMNA is categorized as MLPs, while SMHB is Leveraged Equities. AMNA tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while SMHB tracks Solactive US Small Cap High Dividend Index (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMNA and 0.85% for SMHB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMNA and SMHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer