AMNA vs. AMUB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMNA (ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both MLPs funds from UBS - AMNA tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index while AMUB tracks the Alerian MLP Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMNA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.

Performance

AMNA vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMNA

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMUB

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -2.08%
• YTD: 16.97%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 15.77%
• 3Y*: 15.80%
• 5Y*: 12.34%
• 10Y*: 3.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMNA vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	44.30%	12.50%	20.41%	36.44%	2.88%
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B	16.97%	2.05%	15.68%	16.89%	21.91%	28.83%	-6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AMNA and AMUB is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020	0.77

The correlation between AMNA and AMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMNA vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUB

AMUB Risk / Return Rank: 31
AMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
AMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
AMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 30
AMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
AMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMNA vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMNA	AMUB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.18	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.11	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.00	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	AMNA	AMUB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-79.46%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-10.37%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-17.22%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-78.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-6.15%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-29.23%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.51%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMNA	AMUB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.40%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	13.60%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	20.24%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	27.09%	—

AMNA vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMNA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMNA vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMNA nor AMUB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN	0.00%	0.00%	4.32%	5.61%	5.48%	5.84%	2.12%
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMNA and AMUB in my portfolio?

AMNA and AMUB have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMNA or AMUB?

On fees, AMNA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMNA or AMUB?

AMNA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for AMUB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMNA or AMUB?

AMNA and AMUB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between AMNA and AMUB?

AMNA tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while AMUB tracks Alerian MLP Index. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMNA and 0.80% for AMUB.