AMUB vs. AMLP
Compare and contrast key facts about ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP).
AMUB and AMLP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMUB is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Index. It was launched on Oct 8, 2015. AMLP is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. It was launched on Aug 23, 2010. Both AMUB and AMLP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AMUB or AMLP.
Correlation
The correlation between AMUB and AMLP is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
AMUB vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AMUB:
1.40
AMLP:
1.48
AMUB:
1.98
AMLP:
2.09
AMUB:
1.24
AMLP:
1.26
AMUB:
2.08
AMLP:
2.43
AMUB:
7.20
AMLP:
8.37
AMUB:
2.80%
AMLP:
2.42%
AMUB:
14.38%
AMLP:
13.71%
AMUB:
-73.03%
AMLP:
-77.19%
AMUB:
-9.56%
AMLP:
-8.13%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMUB having a 20.01% return and AMLP slightly higher at 20.19%.
AMUB
20.01%
-3.42%
5.50%
20.01%
13.93%
N/A
AMLP
20.19%
-2.76%
5.36%
20.76%
11.28%
2.38%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMUB vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMUB has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AMUB vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AMUB vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
AMUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, less than AMLP's 7.87% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 6.18% | 6.54% | 6.35% | 7.34% | 10.94% | 8.36% | 8.48% | 7.01% | 6.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.87% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.30% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% | 6.45% | 6.00% |
Drawdowns
AMUB vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMUB drawdown since its inception was -73.03%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUB and AMLP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AMUB vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB) has a higher volatility of 6.08% compared to Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) at 5.36%. This indicates that AMUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.