AMLP vs. MLPX
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and MLPX (Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both MLPs funds - AMLP tracks the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index while MLPX tracks the Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.79%/yr vs 12.45%/yr for MLPX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for MLPX.
Performance
AMLP vs. MLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly lower than MLPX's 24.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed MLPX with an annualized return of 6.79%, while MLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.45% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.03%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 16.62%
- 6M
- 16.20%
- 1Y
- 19.16%
- 3Y*
- 20.25%
- 5Y*
- 17.03%
- 10Y*
- 6.79%
MLPX
- 1D
- 2.03%
- 1M
- -0.98%
- YTD
- 24.08%
- 6M
- 25.26%
- 1Y
- 25.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.29%
- 5Y*
- 21.30%
- 10Y*
- 12.45%
AMLP vs. MLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.62% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.08% | 4.96% | 42.90% | 15.77% | 21.54% | 39.63% | -20.32% | 19.04% | -15.64% | -4.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and MLPX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2013 | 0.88 |
The correlation between AMLP and MLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
AMLP vs. MLPX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMLP
MLPX
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
AMLP
MLPX
Utilities
AMLP
MLPX
Basic Materials
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Communication Services
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Consumer Defensive
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Financial Services
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Healthcare
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Industrials
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Real Estate
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Technology
AMLP
-
MLPX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. MLPX — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
MLPX
AMLP vs. MLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMLP | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 1.64 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.25 | 2.26 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.20 | 3.33 | -1.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 8.64 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMLP | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 1.64 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | 1.07 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.25 | 0.47 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.35 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. MLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than MLPX's maximum drawdown of -70.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and MLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -70.67% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -8.18% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -16.77% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -19.72% | -1.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -64.70% | -7.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.85% | -5.31% | +1.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.40% | -16.63% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.15% | -0.48% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. MLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.94%, while Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (MLPX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | MLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 6.46% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.65% | 11.83% | -3.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.91% | 15.45% | -3.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.98% | 20.08% | -0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 26.50% | +1.18% |
AMLP vs. MLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than MLPX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMLP vs. MLPX - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, more than MLPX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.62% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
MLPX Global X MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.13% | 4.88% | 4.30% | 5.22% | 5.23% | 5.98% | 8.32% | 5.78% | 5.77% | 4.36% | 5.50% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and MLPX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MLPX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to AMLP (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs MLPX's -70.67%.
On 10-year performance, MLPX leads with 12.45% vs 6.79% for AMLP. On fees, MLPX is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MLPX has performed better with a 12.45% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MLPX is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.62%, compared with 4.13% for MLPX.
AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while MLPX tracks Solactive MLP & Energy Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.45% for MLPX.
MLPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and MLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer