AMLP vs. EMB
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while EMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.92%/yr vs 3.39%/yr for EMB. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EMB.
Performance
AMLP vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than EMB's 2.29% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 6.92%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.39% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
EMB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- 11.53%
- 3Y*
- 9.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.79%
- 10Y*
- 3.39%
AMLP vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 2.29% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and EMB is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.25 |
The correlation between AMLP and EMB shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
EMB
AMLP vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMLP | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 2.41 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 10.28 | -4.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -34.70% | -42.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -4.51% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -7.95% | -6.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -28.74% | +7.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -28.74% | -43.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | 0.00% | -4.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -5.05% | -12.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 1.06% | +1.71% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 2.02%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 2.02% | +2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 4.66% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 5.67% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 9.76% | +10.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 9.96% | +17.71% |
AMLP vs. EMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than EMB's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMLP vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than EMB's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.03% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and EMB have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMLP has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to EMB (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs EMB's -34.70%.
On 10-year performance, AMLP leads with 6.92% vs 3.39% for EMB. On fees, EMB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, EMB has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 6.92% return vs 3.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 5.03% for EMB.
AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while EMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while EMB tracks JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.39% for EMB.
EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer