AMINX vs. GSAKX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMINX (Amana Income Fund Institutional Class) and GSAKX (Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A) are both mutual funds - AMINX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Amana, while GSAKX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past 10 years, AMINX returned 12.70%/yr vs 11.49%/yr for GSAKX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMINX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for GSAKX.

Performance

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMINX having a 12.08% return and GSAKX slightly higher at 12.41%. Over the past 10 years, AMINX has outperformed GSAKX with an annualized return of 12.70%, while GSAKX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.49% annualized return.

AMINX

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 3.25%
• YTD: 12.08%
• 6M: 11.89%
• 1Y: 22.98%
• 3Y*: 15.77%
• 5Y*: 11.69%
• 10Y*: 12.70%

GSAKX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: 2.64%
• YTD: 12.41%
• 6M: 12.25%
• 1Y: 29.64%
• 3Y*: 20.39%
• 5Y*: 12.56%
• 10Y*: 11.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	12.08%	16.69%	13.13%	13.87%	-8.65%	22.81%	14.18%	25.59%	-4.94%	21.95%
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	12.41%	33.81%	8.50%	17.26%	-8.28%	13.26%	2.22%	26.54%	-12.40%	26.04%

Correlation

The correlation between AMINX and GSAKX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.67
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.71

The correlation between AMINX and GSAKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMINX vs. GSAKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMINX

AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 44
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

GSAKX

GSAKX Risk / Return Rank: 54
GSAKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
GSAKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
GSAKX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
GSAKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
GSAKX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMINX	GSAKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	2.09	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.68	2.82	-0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.37	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	2.74	-0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.61	9.77	-1.16

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the GSAKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMINX and GSAKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMINX drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum GSAKX drawdown of -56.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMINX and GSAKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMINX	GSAKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.45%	-56.96%	+25.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-11.31%	+0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.34%	-12.18%	-3.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.04%	-26.02%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.45%	-34.49%	+3.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.17%	+0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-12.25%	+8.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	3.15%	-0.36%

Volatility

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a higher volatility of 4.62% compared to Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A (GSAKX) at 4.10%. This indicates that AMINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSAKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMINX	GSAKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.62%	4.10%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.50%	12.11%	-1.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	14.84%	-1.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.01%	14.75%	-0.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.99%	16.10%	-0.11%

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMINX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than GSAKX's 1.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMINX vs. GSAKX - Dividend Comparison

AMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than GSAKX's 3.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	5.20%	5.80%	6.06%	5.61%	8.61%	5.02%	6.91%	8.22%	6.87%	6.04%	4.58%	7.18%
GSAKX Goldman Sachs International Equity Income Fund Class A	3.33%	3.75%	2.93%	2.68%	0.51%	2.74%	1.73%	2.69%	15.27%	1.41%	2.01%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMINX and GSAKX in my portfolio?

AMINX and GSAKX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMINX or GSAKX?

AMINX has higher volatility (4.62%) compared to GSAKX (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMINX dropped -31.45% vs GSAKX's -56.96%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GSAKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.