PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMINX vs. PJDZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMINX having a 12.01% return and PJDZX slightly lower at 11.43%. Over the past 10 years, AMINX has underperformed PJDZX with an annualized return of 12.46%, while PJDZX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.70% annualized return.


AMINX

1D
1.75%
1M
3.18%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.06%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
11.88%
10Y*
12.46%

PJDZX

1D
0.42%
1M
1.01%
YTD
11.43%
6M
11.13%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
26.57%
5Y*
15.16%
10Y*
14.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
12.01%16.69%13.13%13.87%-8.65%22.81%14.18%25.59%-4.94%21.95%
PJDZX
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund
11.43%18.84%40.98%8.67%-10.35%24.62%13.96%32.01%-7.14%17.53%

Correlation

The correlation between AMINX and PJDZX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2014

0.87

The correlation between AMINX and PJDZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMINX vs. PJDZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMINX
AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

PJDZX
PJDZX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PJDZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PJDZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PJDZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PJDZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PJDZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMINXPJDZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.42

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

3.91

-1.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.22

16.86

-8.63

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is comparable to the PJDZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMINX and PJDZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMINX drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum PJDZX drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMINX and PJDZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMINXPJDZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.45%

-33.59%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-6.54%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-16.11%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-17.57%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

-33.59%

+2.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.31%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-3.98%

+0.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

1.51%

+1.28%

Volatility

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a higher volatility of 4.67% compared to PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund (PJDZX) at 3.72%. This indicates that AMINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PJDZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMINXPJDZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.67%

3.72%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.57%

8.93%

+1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

10.99%

+1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.01%

16.50%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.32%

-1.33%

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMINX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than PJDZX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMINX vs. PJDZX - Dividend Comparison

AMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, less than PJDZX's 5.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
5.20%5.80%6.06%5.61%8.61%5.02%6.91%8.22%6.87%6.04%4.58%7.18%
PJDZX
PGIM Jennison Rising Dividend Fund
5.73%6.44%34.62%1.21%0.93%8.48%4.75%4.32%10.34%1.83%1.48%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMINX and PJDZX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMINX has higher volatility (4.67%) compared to PJDZX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMINX dropped -31.45% vs PJDZX's -33.59%.

PJDZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMINX and PJDZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer