PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMINX vs. SVAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMINX achieves a 10.60% return, which is significantly higher than SVAAX's 8.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AMINX has outperformed SVAAX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while SVAAX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.78% annualized return.


AMINX

1D
0.44%
1M
4.68%
YTD
10.60%
6M
10.29%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
16.11%
5Y*
11.25%
10Y*
12.34%

SVAAX

1D
-1.17%
1M
-2.07%
YTD
8.24%
6M
8.78%
1Y
18.36%
3Y*
14.91%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
7.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
10.60%16.69%13.13%13.87%-8.65%22.81%14.18%25.59%-4.94%21.95%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
8.24%14.42%16.29%-2.07%8.07%21.36%-8.15%19.42%-8.44%14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between AMINX and SVAAX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between AMINX and SVAAX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMINX vs. SVAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMINX
AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAAX
SVAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SVAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMINXSVAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.94

2.32

-0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.80

3.40

-0.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.36

+0.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.64

6.32

+2.32

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SVAAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMINX and SVAAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMINXSVAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.94

2.32

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.77

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.52

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.72

0.48

+0.24

Drawdowns

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMINX drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum SVAAX drawdown of -51.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMINX and SVAAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMINXSVAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.45%

-51.16%

+19.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-4.71%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.34%

-12.84%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.04%

-16.17%

-2.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.45%

-36.47%

+5.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.76%

+3.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-8.21%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.59%

+0.19%

Volatility

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) is 3.28%, while Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A (SVAAX) has a volatility of 3.63%. This indicates that AMINX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMINXSVAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

3.63%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.89%

7.48%

+2.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.38%

10.32%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

13.65%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.94%

15.39%

+0.55%

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMINX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than SVAAX's 1.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMINX vs. SVAAX - Dividend Comparison

AMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, less than SVAAX's 5.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMINX
Amana Income Fund Institutional Class
5.27%5.80%6.06%5.61%8.61%5.02%6.91%8.22%6.87%6.04%4.58%7.18%
SVAAX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund Class A
5.90%5.80%7.38%4.10%9.49%3.50%4.06%8.55%8.39%10.16%5.00%8.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMINX and SVAAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAAX has higher volatility (3.63%) compared to AMINX (3.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMINX dropped -31.45% vs SVAAX's -51.16%.

SVAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMINX and SVAAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer