AMINX vs. FRDTX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AMINX (Amana Income Fund Institutional Class) and FRDTX (Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C) are both mutual funds - AMINX is a Dividend fund actively managed by Amana, while FRDTX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, AMINX returned 12.05%/yr vs 11.76%/yr for FRDTX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. AMINX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.59%/yr for FRDTX.

Performance

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMINX achieves a 12.82% return, which is significantly higher than FRDTX's 7.78% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMINX having a 12.05% annualized return and FRDTX not far behind at 11.76%.

AMINX

• 1D: 1.61%
• 1M: -0.29%
• 6M: 10.38%
• YTD: 12.82%
• 1Y: 21.50%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: 12.05%
• ALL TIME*: 11.04%

FRDTX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 6.82%
• YTD: 7.78%
• 1Y: 12.74%
• 3Y*: 14.14%
• 5Y*: 9.13%
• 10Y*: 11.76%
• ALL TIME*: 9.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	12.82%	16.69%	13.13%	13.87%	-8.65%	22.81%	14.18%	25.59%	-4.94%	21.95%
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C	7.78%	11.13%	21.73%	11.27%	-11.36%	25.67%	15.42%	28.87%	-5.99%	19.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AMINX and FRDTX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.87
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.91

The correlation between AMINX and FRDTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AMINX vs. FRDTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMINX

AMINX Risk / Return Rank: 57
AMINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
AMINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
AMINX Omega Ratio Rank: 58
AMINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
AMINX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

FRDTX

FRDTX Risk / Return Rank: 33
FRDTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FRDTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FRDTX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FRDTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FRDTX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) and Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMINX	FRDTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.51	1.06	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	1.56	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.19	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.82	1.52	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.24	5.86	+1.38

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMINX Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the FRDTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMINX and FRDTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMINX drawdown since its inception was -31.45%, smaller than the maximum FRDTX drawdown of -52.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMINX and FRDTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMINX	FRDTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.45%	-52.13%	+20.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.00%	-7.20%	-3.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.34%	-18.54%	+3.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.04%	-21.53%	+2.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.45%	-34.93%	+3.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.09%	-0.23%	-0.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.61%	-6.52%	+2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	1.87%	+0.89%

Volatility

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Volatility Comparison

Amana Income Fund Institutional Class (AMINX) has a higher volatility of 3.49% compared to Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C (FRDTX) at 2.81%. This indicates that AMINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRDTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMINX	FRDTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	2.81%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.94%	7.77%	+3.17%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.27%	10.35%	+2.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.08%	17.44%	-3.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.95%	18.07%	-2.12%

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMINX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than FRDTX's 1.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMINX vs. FRDTX - Dividend Comparison

AMINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, less than FRDTX's 8.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMINX Amana Income Fund Institutional Class	5.16%	5.80%	6.06%	5.61%	8.61%	5.02%	6.91%	8.22%	6.87%	6.04%	4.58%	7.18%
FRDTX Franklin Rising Dividends Fund Class C	8.98%	9.73%	19.21%	3.91%	4.27%	3.95%	0.17%	2.35%	4.44%	2.59%	2.61%	4.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMINX and FRDTX in my portfolio?

AMINX and FRDTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMINX or FRDTX?

AMINX has higher volatility (3.49%) compared to FRDTX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMINX dropped -31.45% vs FRDTX's -52.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.