AMEM.DE vs. QQQ
AMEM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEM.DE returned 9.86%/yr vs 21.63%/yr for QQQ. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEM.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMEM.DE is traded in EUR, while QQQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQ values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEM.DE achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 22.75% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEM.DE has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 9.86%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.63% annualized return.
AMEM.DE
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 27.34%
- 6M
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 9.98%
- YTD
- 22.75%
- 6M
- 20.16%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 25.35%
- 5Y*
- 19.08%
- 10Y*
- 21.63%
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 27.34% | 19.31% | 13.70% | 5.24% | -13.78% | 3.95% | 6.30% | 21.51% | -11.20% | 20.75% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 22.09% | 6.44% | 33.87% | 50.21% | -28.40% | 36.95% | 36.37% | 42.10% | 4.56% | 16.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEM.DE and QQQ is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011 | 0.47 |
The correlation between AMEM.DE and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (5 years) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMEM.DE
QQQ
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEM.DE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.42 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.65 | 3.57 | +1.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.89 | 11.19 | +5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEM.DE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.80 | 2.43 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.96 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 0.79 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -46.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEM.DE and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEM.DE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.87% | -46.01% | +10.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.65% | -11.01% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.22% | -27.21% | +7.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.53% | -30.99% | +7.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.93% | -30.99% | -0.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.62% | -0.05% | -2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -7.79% | -2.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 3.51% | -0.57% |
Volatility
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 3.69%. This indicates that AMEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEM.DE | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 3.69% | +3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.02% | 11.51% | +3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 16.16% | +1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.70% | 22.03% | -5.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.28% | 22.60% | -4.32% |
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEM.DE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
AMEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.38% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEM.DE and QQQ have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEM.DE.
AMEM.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEM.DE and 0.18% for QQQ.
Find the right allocation for AMEM.DE and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer