AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while LYTR.DE is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE returned 7.37%/yr vs 7.61%/yr for LYTR.DE. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LYTR.DE.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 14.06% return, which is significantly lower than LYTR.DE's 18.27% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMEL.DE having a 7.37% annualized return and LYTR.DE not far ahead at 7.61%.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- -1.29%
- YTD
- 14.06%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- 1Y
- 38.03%
- 3Y*
- 10.73%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.37%
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -8.46%
- YTD
- 18.27%
- 6M
- 20.76%
- 1Y
- 44.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.81%
- 10Y*
- 7.61%
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 14.06% | 38.05% | -22.20% | 28.15% | 16.33% | -3.25% | -21.25% | 20.70% | -3.30% | 8.15% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 18.27% | 17.59% | 13.34% | -15.11% | 27.02% | 52.42% | -19.47% | 14.16% | -6.16% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and LYTR.DE is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011 | 0.36 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMEL.DE and LYTR.DE has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
LYTR.DE
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEL.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.87 | 3.18 | -0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.71 | 10.95 | -2.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, smaller than the maximum LYTR.DE drawdown of -67.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and LYTR.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.71% | -67.76% | +15.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -13.95% | +0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.37% | -17.04% | -8.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -30.28% | +4.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -44.61% | -6.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.25% | -13.54% | +5.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.85% | -32.82% | +14.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.36% | 4.06% | +0.30% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.42% compared to Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) at 4.49%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYTR.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | LYTR.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.42% | 4.49% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.64% | 20.59% | -4.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.95% | 22.63% | -3.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.03% | 19.46% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 18.36% | +6.91% |
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LYTR.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. LYTR.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEL.DE nor LYTR.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and LYTR.DE have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while LYTR.DE is Commodities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.30% for LYTR.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and LYTR.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer