LYTR.DE vs. COMT
LYTR.DE (Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both Commodities funds - LYTR.DE tracks the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted while COMT tracks the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYTR.DE returned 7.78%/yr vs 7.67%/yr for COMT. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYTR.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYTR.DE is traded in EUR, while COMT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COMT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 18.70% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 27.23% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LYTR.DE having a 7.78% annualized return and COMT not far behind at 7.67%.
LYTR.DE
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -9.80%
- YTD
- 18.70%
- 6M
- 21.20%
- 1Y
- 45.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 14.89%
- 10Y*
- 7.78%
COMT
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- 27.23%
- 6M
- 26.48%
- 1Y
- 31.12%
- 3Y*
- 10.15%
- 5Y*
- 11.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.67%
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 18.70% | 17.59% | 13.34% | -15.11% | 27.02% | 52.42% | -19.47% | 14.16% | -6.16% | -11.60% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 27.23% | -6.51% | 12.95% | -9.36% | 26.85% | 47.12% | -25.36% | 13.32% | -2.29% | -2.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTR.DE and COMT is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2014 | 0.64 |
The correlation between LYTR.DE and COMT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYTR.DE vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
LYTR.DE
COMT
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYTR.DE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.25 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.27 | 1.98 | +1.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.51 | 7.24 | +4.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.76%, which is greater than COMT's maximum drawdown of -44.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYTR.DE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.76% | -44.19% | -23.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.95% | -15.77% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.04% | -18.43% | +1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -31.58% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.61% | -35.89% | -8.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.23% | -14.32% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.82% | -19.94% | -12.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 4.31% | -0.34% |
Volatility
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) is 4.59%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.82%. This indicates that LYTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYTR.DE | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 5.82% | -1.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.59% | 20.74% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 23.13% | -0.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.46% | 22.18% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 19.78% | -1.42% |
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYTR.DE vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
LYTR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 6.29% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYTR.DE and COMT have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYTR.DE is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYTR.DE is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
LYTR.DE tracks Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LYTR.DE and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for LYTR.DE and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer