AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE).

AMEL.DE and IQQB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMEL.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. IQQB.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Brazil. It was launched on Nov 18, 2005. Both AMEL.DE and IQQB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR	18.02%	38.06%	-22.22%	28.09%	16.34%	-3.21%	-21.29%	20.69%	-3.27%	8.15%
IQQB.DE iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)	24.33%	29.90%	-24.72%	25.50%	22.21%	-15.61%	-22.22%	25.55%	-1.12%	10.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly lower than IQQB.DE's 24.33% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed IQQB.DE with an annualized return of 8.03%, while IQQB.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 8.54% annualized return.

AMEL.DE

• 1D: 2.32%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 18.02%
• 6M: 28.91%
• 1Y: 47.07%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: 13.56%
• 10Y*: 8.03%

IQQB.DE

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: 1.62%
• YTD: 24.33%
• 6M: 32.60%
• 1Y: 43.62%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 12.19%
• 10Y*: 8.54%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQB.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.

IQQB.DE

iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)

AMEL.DE

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR

Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE

AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 93
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 93

IQQB.DE

IQQB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 86
IQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
IQQB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
IQQB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 80
IQQB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IQQB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMEL.DE	IQQB.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.33	1.86	+0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.94	2.46	+0.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.32	+0.08
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	3.77	+0.14
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.90	11.42	+3.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the IQQB.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and IQQB.DE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMEL.DE	IQQB.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.33	1.86	+0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.47	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.27	+0.05
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.10	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and IQQB.DE is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQB.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IQQB.DE iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist)	3.89%	4.47%	6.44%	5.50%	13.94%	6.23%	1.92%	2.46%	2.55%	1.49%	1.74%	3.53%

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, smaller than the maximum IQQB.DE drawdown of -69.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and IQQB.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMEL.DE	IQQB.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.69%	-69.27%	+16.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.49%	-12.63%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.38%	-28.03%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.31%	-52.58%	+1.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-0.60%	-1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.04%	-28.76%	+10.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.25%	3.97%	-0.72%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. IQQB.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and iShares MSCI Brazil UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQB.DE) have volatilities of 7.85% and 8.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMEL.DE	IQQB.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.85%	8.22%	-0.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.83%	17.43%	-2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.20%	23.43%	-3.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.82%	25.88%	-5.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.40%	31.79%	-6.39%