AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE).
AMEL.DE and FLXB.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMEL.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America. It was launched on Mar 22, 2018. FLXB.DE is a passively managed fund by Franklin Templeton that tracks the performance of the FTSE Brazil 30/18 Capped. It was launched on Jun 4, 2019. Both AMEL.DE and FLXB.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 18.02% | 38.06% | -22.22% | 28.09% | 16.34% | -3.21% | -21.29% | 10.36% |
FLXB.DE Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF | 26.00% | 29.01% | -23.72% | 28.92% | 18.78% | -11.29% | -26.34% | 15.80% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 18.02% return, which is significantly lower than FLXB.DE's 26.00% return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 2.32%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 18.02%
- 6M
- 28.91%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 16.42%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.03%
FLXB.DE
- 1D
- 1.91%
- 1M
- 2.12%
- YTD
- 26.00%
- 6M
- 34.22%
- 1Y
- 43.33%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.89%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXB.DE's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
FLXB.DE
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEL.DE | FLXB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.33 | 1.79 | +0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 2.34 | +0.60 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.32 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.92 | 3.46 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.90 | 11.81 | +3.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEL.DE | FLXB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.33 | 1.79 | +0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.49 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.14 | 0.17 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and FLXB.DE is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEL.DE nor FLXB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.69%, roughly equal to the maximum FLXB.DE drawdown of -54.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and FLXB.DE.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | FLXB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.69% | -54.94% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.49% | -13.39% | +0.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.38% | -28.51% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | 0.00% | -2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.04% | -18.71% | +0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 3.77% | -0.52% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. FLXB.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) is 7.85%, while Franklin FTSE Brazil UCITS ETF (FLXB.DE) has a volatility of 8.81%. This indicates that AMEL.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | FLXB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.85% | 8.81% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 18.66% | -3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.20% | 24.18% | -3.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.82% | 25.85% | -5.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.40% | 31.25% | -5.85% |