LYTR.DE vs. QQQ
Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ).
LYTR.DE and QQQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LYTR.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Energy and Metals Equal-Weighted. It was launched on Feb 21, 2019. QQQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 1999. Both LYTR.DE and QQQ are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LYTR.DE or QQQ.
Key characteristics
| LYTR.DE | QQQ | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.73% | 25.94% |
| 1Y Return | 4.71% | 38.64% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 5.87% | 9.61% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 8.00% | 21.45% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 1.24% | 18.54% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.37 | 2.22 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.60 | 2.91 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.08 | 1.40 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.19 | 2.86 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.80 | 10.42 |
| Ulcer Index | 7.06% | 3.72% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.43% | 17.47% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.69% | -82.98% |
| Current Drawdown | -21.62% | 0.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYTR.DE and QQQ is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LYTR.DE achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 25.94% return. Over the past 10 years, LYTR.DE has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 1.24%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 18.54% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYTR.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.20% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
LYTR.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYTR.DE Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ | 0.59% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% | 1.41% | 1.02% |
Drawdowns
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYTR.DE drawdown since its inception was -67.69%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYTR.DE and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LYTR.DE vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Bloomberg Equal-Weight Commodity Ex-Agriculture UCITS ETF Acc (LYTR.DE) is 4.85%, while Invesco QQQ (QQQ) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that LYTR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.