AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and XB4A.DE (Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while XB4A.DE tracks the ATX Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMED.DE returned 10.77%/yr vs 17.80%/yr for XB4A.DE. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly lower than XB4A.DE's 22.80% return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
XB4A.DE
- 1D
- -1.41%
- 1M
- -2.86%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- YTD
- 22.80%
- 1Y
- 45.21%
- 3Y*
- 30.57%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 14.60%
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 18.14% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.98% | -1.09% |
XB4A.DE Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) | 22.80% | 51.29% | 11.01% | 14.27% | -16.45% | 42.39% | -10.86% | 19.79% | -17.99% | 1.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and XB4A.DE is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017 | 0.75 |
The correlation between AMED.DE and XB4A.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
XB4A.DE
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMED.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 4.13 | -1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 13.97 | -3.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, smaller than the maximum XB4A.DE drawdown of -53.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and XB4A.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -53.54% | +15.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.88% | +0.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -16.26% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -32.50% | +8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -3.43% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -9.88% | +4.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.23% | -0.50% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) is 3.63%, while Xtrackers ATX UCITS ETF (Acc) (XB4A.DE) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that AMED.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XB4A.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | XB4A.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 4.97% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 14.95% | -1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 17.66% | -2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 19.15% | -3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 20.15% | -2.81% |
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMED.DE and XB4A.DE have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. XB4A.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor XB4A.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and XB4A.DE have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE and XB4A.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while XB4A.DE tracks ATX Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and XB4A.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer