PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDY vs. MRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDY vs. MRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDY achieves a 97.19% return, which is significantly higher than MRNY's 80.55% return.


AMDY

1D
-5.15%
1M
-0.14%
6M
92.76%
YTD
97.19%
1Y
156.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MRNY

1D
-6.67%
1M
9.93%
6M
42.34%
YTD
80.55%
1Y
53.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDY vs. MRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
97.19%53.93%-17.00%32.00%
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
80.55%-35.72%-59.32%18.27%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDY and MRNY is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2023

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDY vs. MRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDY
AMDY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AMDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDY Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MRNY
MRNY Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
MRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
MRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
MRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
MRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDY vs. MRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) and YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMDYMRNYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.21

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.70

1.69

+4.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.64

3.25

+9.39

AMDY vs. MRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDY Sharpe Ratio is 2.73, which is higher than the MRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDY and MRNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMDY vs. MRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDY drawdown since its inception was -53.92%, smaller than the maximum MRNY drawdown of -82.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDY and MRNY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDYMRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.92%

-82.15%

+28.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.59%

-31.53%

+3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.44%

-61.99%

+50.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.49%

-52.99%

+35.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.42%

16.38%

-3.96%

Volatility

AMDY vs. MRNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF (AMDY) is 17.85%, while YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF (MRNY) has a volatility of 21.57%. This indicates that AMDY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDYMRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.85%

21.57%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.40%

38.66%

+6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.53%

53.19%

+4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.23%

51.61%

-4.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.23%

51.61%

-4.38%

AMDY vs. MRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDY has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than MRNY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDY vs. MRNY - Dividend Comparison

AMDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 73.90%, less than MRNY's 96.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMDY
YieldMax AMD Option Income Strategy ETF
73.90%80.68%109.98%6.68%
MRNY
YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF
96.59%145.98%178.49%1.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMDY and MRNY have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MRNY has higher volatility (21.57%) compared to AMDY (17.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMDY dropped -53.92% vs MRNY's -82.15%.

On 1-year performance, AMDY leads with 156.26% vs 53.06% for MRNY. On fees, MRNY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMDY has been the lower-risk option at 17.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMDY has performed better with a 156.26% return vs 53.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MRNY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.23% for AMDY.

MRNY has the higher dividend yield at 96.59%, compared with 73.90% for AMDY.

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax ETFs and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.23% for AMDY and 0.99% for MRNY.

AMDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDY and MRNY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer