AMDW vs. PLTW

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and PLTW (PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

AMDW vs. PLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than PLTW's -42.11% return.

AMDW

• 1D: -7.20%
• 1M: 12.58%
• YTD: 176.01%
• 6M: 174.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTW

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: -18.15%
• YTD: -42.11%
• 6M: -48.01%
• 1Y: -26.59%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. PLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	176.01%	36.56%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	-42.11%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and PLTW is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.30

AMDW vs. PLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMDW	PLTW
Technology	27.8%	20.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMDW vs. PLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PLTW

PLTW Risk / Return Rank: 5
PLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
PLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. PLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF (PLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDW	PLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.43	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-0.26	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.97	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.51	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.98	—

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. PLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum PLTW drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and PLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDW	PLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-52.65%	+18.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-52.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-52.65%	+45.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.25%	-23.35%	+9.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	27.25%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDW	PLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	23.13%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.72%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.41%	61.56%	+21.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.41%	74.29%	+9.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.41%	74.29%	+9.12%

AMDW vs. PLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDW and PLTW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

AMDW vs. PLTW - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, less than PLTW's 151.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.14%	34.78%
PLTW PLTR WeeklyPay™ ETF	151.83%	72.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDW and PLTW in my portfolio?

AMDW and PLTW have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDW or PLTW?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDW or PLTW?

AMDW and PLTW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDW or PLTW?

PLTW has the higher dividend yield at 151.83%, compared with 37.14% for AMDW.