PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMDW vs. IPDP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMDW vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IPDP

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison


AMDW vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMDW
IPDP

Technology

28.6%
13.1%

Basic Materials

-

1.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

3.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

3.9%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

18.6%

Healthcare

-

13.6%

Industrials

-

45.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

AMDW
28.6%
IPDP
13.1%

Basic Materials

AMDW

-

IPDP
1.5%

Communication Services

AMDW

-

IPDP

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMDW

-

IPDP
3.6%

Consumer Defensive

AMDW

-

IPDP
3.9%

Energy

AMDW

-

IPDP

-

Financial Services

AMDW

-

IPDP
18.6%

Healthcare

AMDW

-

IPDP
13.6%

Industrials

AMDW

-

IPDP
45.1%

Real Estate

AMDW

-

IPDP

-

Utilities

AMDW

-

IPDP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMDW vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMDW vs. IPDP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMDWIPDPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.83

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and IPDP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMDWIPDPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.64%

0.00%

-34.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.66%

0.00%

-14.66%

Volatility

AMDW vs. IPDP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMDWIPDPDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

81.56%

0.00%

+81.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

81.56%

0.00%

+81.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

81.56%

0.00%

+81.56%

AMDW vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMDW vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.98%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%
IPDP
Dividend Performers ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 1.52% for IPDP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMDW and IPDP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer