AMDW vs. CHAT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMDW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while CHAT is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CHAT.

Performance

AMDW vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than CHAT's 63.45% return.

AMDW

• 1D: -7.20%
• 1M: 12.58%
• YTD: 176.01%
• 6M: 174.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CHAT

• 1D: -7.40%
• 1M: 7.27%
• YTD: 63.45%
• 6M: 62.78%
• 1Y: 115.67%
• 3Y*: 51.32%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	176.01%	36.56%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	63.45%	19.85%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and CHAT is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.68

AMDW vs. CHAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMDW	CHAT
Technology	27.8%	77.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	16.1%
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	3.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMDW vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CHAT

CHAT Risk / Return Rank: 89
CHAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
CHAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
CHAT Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CHAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CHAT Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDW vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMDW	CHAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	3.34	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.49	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.14	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.81	—

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and CHAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDW	CHAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-31.34%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.28%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-31.34%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-7.40%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.25%	-5.38%	-8.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.86%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDW	CHAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	19.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	29.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.41%	34.87%	+48.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.41%	31.22%	+52.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.41%	31.22%	+52.19%

AMDW vs. CHAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than CHAT's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMDW vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, more than CHAT's 1.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.14%	34.78%
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF	1.74%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDW and CHAT in my portfolio?

AMDW and CHAT have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDW or CHAT?

On fees, CHAT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDW or CHAT?

CHAT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDW or CHAT?

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 1.74% for CHAT.

What is the main difference between AMDW and CHAT?

AMDW is categorized as Derivative Income, while CHAT is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.75% for CHAT.