AMDW vs. BITK

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and BITK (Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.

Performance

AMDW vs. BITK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 176.01% return, which is significantly higher than BITK's -32.04% return.

AMDW

• 1D: -7.20%
• 1M: 12.58%
• YTD: 176.01%
• 6M: 174.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BITK

• 1D: -3.11%
• 1M: -18.15%
• YTD: -32.04%
• 6M: -32.27%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDW vs. BITK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	176.01%	36.64%
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF	-32.04%	-27.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AMDW and BITK is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025	0.46

Return for Risk

AMDW vs. BITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

AMDW vs. BITK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum BITK drawdown of -56.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and BITK.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDW	BITK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-56.28%	+21.64%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.20%	-54.86%	+47.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.25%	-36.01%	+21.76%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMDW	BITK	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.41%	49.31%	+34.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	83.41%	49.31%	+34.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	83.41%	49.31%	+34.10%

AMDW vs. BITK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDW and BITK have an expense ratio of 0.99%.

Dividends

AMDW vs. BITK - Dividend Comparison

AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.14%, less than BITK's 48.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	37.14%	34.78%
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF	48.83%	23.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMDW and BITK in my portfolio?

AMDW and BITK have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMDW or BITK?

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMDW or BITK?

AMDW and BITK have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMDW or BITK?

BITK has the higher dividend yield at 48.83%, compared with 37.14% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between AMDW and BITK?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Tuttle Capital Management.