AMDW vs. BITK
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and BITK (Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMDW vs. BITK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 192.40% return, which is significantly higher than BITK's -28.68% return.
AMDW
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- 72.80%
- YTD
- 192.40%
- 6M
- 186.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITK
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -17.17%
- YTD
- -28.68%
- 6M
- -34.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW vs. BITK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 192.40% | 36.73% |
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | -28.68% | -27.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and BITK is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. BITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDW | BITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.83 | -1.24 | +6.07 |
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. BITK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum BITK drawdown of -53.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and BITK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | BITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -53.08% | +18.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -52.63% | +52.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.66% | -34.87% | +20.21% |
Volatility
AMDW vs. BITK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | BITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.56% | 49.59% | +31.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 49.59% | +31.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 49.59% | +31.97% |
AMDW vs. BITK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMDW and BITK have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMDW vs. BITK - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.98%, less than BITK's 44.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 28.98% | 34.78% |
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | 44.82% | 23.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and BITK have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW and BITK have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
BITK has the higher dividend yield at 44.82%, compared with 28.98% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Tuttle Capital Management.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and BITK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer