AMDW vs. BITK
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and BITK (Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.99% expense ratio.
Performance
AMDW vs. BITK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMDW achieves a 163.57% return, which is significantly higher than BITK's -30.37% return.
AMDW
- 1D
- -6.28%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- 6M
- 145.80%
- YTD
- 163.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BITK
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -2.68%
- 6M
- -36.26%
- YTD
- -30.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW vs. BITK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.57% | 36.64% |
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | -30.37% | -27.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and BITK is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. BITK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF (BITK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. BITK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, smaller than the maximum BITK drawdown of -57.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and BITK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | BITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -57.48% | +22.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.03% | -53.75% | +37.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.84% | -37.52% | +23.68% |
Volatility
AMDW vs. BITK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | BITK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.60% | 48.16% | +35.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.60% | 48.16% | +35.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 83.60% | 48.16% | +35.44% |
AMDW vs. BITK - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AMDW and BITK have an expense ratio of 0.99%.
Dividends
AMDW vs. BITK - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.55%, less than BITK's 49.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 45.55% | 34.78% |
BITK Tuttle Capital Bitcoin 0DTE Covered Call ETF | 49.49% | 23.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and BITK have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDW and BITK have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.
BITK has the higher dividend yield at 49.49%, compared with 45.55% for AMDW.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Tuttle Capital Management.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and BITK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer