AMDW vs. ACII
AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) and ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.80, they often move in opposite directions. AMDW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ACII.
Performance
AMDW vs. ACII - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AMDW
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- 72.80%
- YTD
- 192.40%
- 6M
- 186.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDW vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 5.66% |
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -1.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMDW and ACII is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | -0.80 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMDW vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMDW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.83 | -7.55 | +12.38 |
Drawdowns
AMDW vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMDW drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDW and ACII.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMDW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.64% | -1.27% | -33.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.27% | +1.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.66% | -0.42% | -14.24% |
Volatility
AMDW vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMDW | ACII | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 81.56% | 7.65% | +73.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 7.65% | +73.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.56% | 7.65% | +73.91% |
AMDW vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMDW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMDW vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison
AMDW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.98%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.74% | 0.00% |
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF | 28.98% | 34.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMDW and ACII have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.
AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMDW and 0.79% for ACII.
Find the right allocation for AMDW and ACII
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer