ACII vs. GOOW
ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and GOOW (Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ACII charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GOOW.
Performance
ACII vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ACII
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOW
- 1D
- -5.04%
- 1M
- -8.06%
- YTD
- 16.46%
- 6M
- 14.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ACII vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | -0.14% |
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | -9.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACII and GOOW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACII vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACII | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -4.37 | 3.51 | -7.88 |
Drawdowns
ACII vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACII drawdown since its inception was -0.32%, smaller than the maximum GOOW drawdown of -24.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACII and GOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACII | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -24.88% | +24.56% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.32% | -12.41% | +12.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.14% | -4.76% | +4.62% |
Volatility
ACII vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACII | GOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.15% | 37.44% | -34.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 37.44% | -34.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.15% | 37.44% | -34.29% |
ACII vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACII has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACII vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison
ACII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than GOOW's 34.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ACII Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | 0.73% | 0.00% |
GOOW Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF | 34.90% | 19.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACII and GOOW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GOOW.
GOOW has the higher dividend yield at 34.90%, compared with 0.73% for ACII.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for ACII and 0.99% for GOOW.
Find the right allocation for ACII and GOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer