AMDL vs. CONL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL).

AMDL and CONL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AMDL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Mar 15, 2024. CONL is an actively managed fund by GraniteShares. It was launched on Aug 9, 2022.

Performance

AMDL vs. CONL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

AMDL vs. CONL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	-21.48%	103.00%	-69.97%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	-52.22%	-58.49%	-45.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMDL achieves a -21.48% return, which is significantly higher than CONL's -52.22% return.

AMDL

• 1D: 7.48%
• 1M: -0.41%
• YTD: -21.48%
• 6M: 18.20%
• 1Y: 137.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONL

• 1D: 16.67%
• 1M: -8.14%
• YTD: -52.22%
• 6M: -81.28%
• 1Y: -49.49%
• 3Y*: -11.69%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMDL vs. CONL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMDL and CONL have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

AMDL

GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF

CONL

GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF

Return for Risk

AMDL vs. CONL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMDL

AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 72
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 77
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

CONL

CONL Risk / Return Rank: 10
CONL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
CONL Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CONL Omega Ratio Rank: 17
CONL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
CONL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMDL vs. CONL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMDL	CONL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.07	-0.33	+1.40
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.17	0.42	+1.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.05	+0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	-0.55	+2.96
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.72	-0.92	+5.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMDL vs. CONL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMDL Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the CONL Sharpe Ratio of -0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMDL and CONL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMDL	CONL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.07	-0.33	+1.40
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.27	-0.17	-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between AMDL and CONL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

AMDL vs. CONL - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMDL nor CONL has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CONL GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.31%

Drawdowns

AMDL vs. CONL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMDL drawdown since its inception was -88.63%, smaller than the maximum CONL drawdown of -93.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMDL and CONL.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMDL	CONL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.63%	-93.95%	+5.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.13%	-92.02%	+35.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.14%	-91.78%	+39.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-51.71%	-54.28%	+2.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.66%	54.87%	-26.21%

Volatility

AMDL vs. CONL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL) is 32.68%, while GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) has a volatility of 45.82%. This indicates that AMDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CONL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMDL	CONL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	32.68%	45.82%	-13.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	97.70%	103.19%	-5.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.18%	149.22%	-20.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.42%	151.01%	-39.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	111.42%	151.01%	-39.59%