PortfoliosLab logo
CONL vs. MSTU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CONL and MSTU is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CONL vs. MSTU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CONL:

171.74%

MSTU:

209.09%

Max Drawdown

CONL:

-87.62%

MSTU:

-86.19%

Current Drawdown

CONL:

-66.30%

MSTU:

-61.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CONL achieves a -18.67% return, which is significantly lower than MSTU's 28.68% return.


CONL

YTD

-18.67%

1M

106.47%

6M

-44.25%

1Y

-30.26%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

MSTU

YTD

28.68%

1M

72.49%

6M

-22.75%

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CONL vs. MSTU - Expense Ratio Comparison

CONL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than MSTU's 1.05% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CONL vs. MSTU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CONL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CONL is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CONL is 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CONL is 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CONL is 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CONL is 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CONL is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

MSTU
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CONL vs. MSTU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long COIN Daily ETF (CONL) and T-Rex 2X Long MSTR Daily Target ETF (MSTU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CONL vs. MSTU - Dividend Comparison

Neither CONL nor MSTU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

CONL vs. MSTU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CONL drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, roughly equal to the maximum MSTU drawdown of -86.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CONL and MSTU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CONL vs. MSTU - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...