PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMCGX vs. VMFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMCGX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 19.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX has underperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 8.16%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.85% annualized return.


AMCGX

1D
2.01%
1M
7.68%
YTD
8.73%
6M
6.74%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
-3.93%
10Y*
8.16%

VMFGX

1D
1.36%
1M
3.54%
YTD
19.74%
6M
16.89%
1Y
31.93%
3Y*
17.38%
5Y*
9.27%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.73%16.63%20.10%22.85%-35.19%-29.98%63.90%29.63%-8.03%27.39%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
19.74%7.43%15.86%17.42%-18.99%18.83%22.61%26.20%-10.39%19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AMCGX and VMFGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012

0.88

The correlation between AMCGX and VMFGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMCGX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMCGX
AMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

VMFGX
VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMCGXVMFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

3.23

-1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

12.76

-8.64

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMCGX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMCGX drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCGX and VMFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMCGXVMFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.93%

-39.15%

-35.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-9.91%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-25.45%

-1.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.50%

-29.25%

-35.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.50%

-39.15%

-25.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.81%

-0.13%

-30.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-5.69%

-17.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

2.50%

+2.56%

Volatility

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 5.83%. This indicates that AMCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMCGXVMFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

5.83%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

13.71%

+1.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.78%

17.38%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.57%

20.70%

+9.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

21.10%

+5.77%

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMCGX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMCGX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

AMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.34%13.72%10.98%7.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VMFGX
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.59%0.70%0.84%1.21%1.12%0.53%0.79%1.22%1.18%0.93%1.14%1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMCGX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMCGX has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to VMFGX (5.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCGX dropped -74.93% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMCGX and VMFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer