PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMCGX vs. ALAFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMCGX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than ALAFX's 18.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX has underperformed ALAFX with an annualized return of 8.16%, while ALAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 22.10% annualized return.


AMCGX

1D
2.01%
1M
7.68%
YTD
8.73%
6M
6.74%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
-3.93%
10Y*
8.16%

ALAFX

1D
2.30%
1M
5.27%
YTD
18.18%
6M
16.66%
1Y
49.66%
3Y*
40.88%
5Y*
20.29%
10Y*
22.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
8.73%16.63%20.10%22.85%-35.19%-29.98%63.90%29.63%-8.03%27.39%
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
18.18%39.65%51.72%44.15%-35.95%20.00%45.73%33.84%1.33%28.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AMCGX and ALAFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.88

The correlation between AMCGX and ALAFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMCGX vs. ALAFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMCGX
AMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
AMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ALAFX
ALAFX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
ALAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
ALAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMCGXALAFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.35

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.29

2.77

-1.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

9.20

-5.09

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the ALAFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMCGX and ALAFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMCGX drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, which is greater than ALAFX's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCGX and ALAFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMCGXALAFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.93%

-43.65%

-31.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-17.58%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-26.96%

+0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.50%

-43.65%

-20.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.50%

-43.65%

-20.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.81%

0.00%

-30.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.88%

-7.67%

-15.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.06%

5.27%

-0.21%

Volatility

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) is 6.96%, while Alger Focus Equity A Fund (ALAFX) has a volatility of 8.96%. This indicates that AMCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMCGXALAFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

8.96%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.69%

17.74%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.78%

22.73%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.57%

26.41%

+4.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.87%

24.11%

+2.76%

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMCGX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than ALAFX's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMCGX vs. ALAFX - Dividend Comparison

AMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.69%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ALAFX
Alger Focus Equity A Fund
6.69%7.91%0.00%0.10%0.06%14.09%6.28%1.98%5.41%
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.34%13.72%10.98%7.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMCGX and ALAFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ALAFX has higher volatility (8.96%) compared to AMCGX (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCGX dropped -74.93% vs ALAFX's -43.65%.

ALAFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMCGX and ALAFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer