PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMCGX vs. BARAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Baron Asset Fund (BARAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMCGX achieves a 3.65% return, which is significantly higher than BARAX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AMCGX has underperformed BARAX with an annualized return of 7.27%, while BARAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.30% annualized return.


AMCGX

1D
2.11%
1M
-4.59%
6M
4.96%
YTD
3.65%
1Y
9.20%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
-5.57%
10Y*
7.27%
ALL TIME*
32.25%

BARAX

1D
-0.89%
1M
-10.38%
6M
1.29%
YTD
-2.47%
1Y
3.06%
3Y*
6.65%
5Y*
0.39%
10Y*
10.30%
ALL TIME*
9.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
3.65%16.63%20.10%22.85%-35.19%-29.98%63.90%29.63%-8.03%27.39%
BARAX
Baron Asset Fund
-2.47%7.89%10.35%17.05%-26.06%13.88%32.98%37.64%-0.15%26.18%

Correlation

The correlation between AMCGX and BARAX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.83

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 1996

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between AMCGX and BARAX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMCGX vs. BARAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMCGX
AMCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
AMCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
AMCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BARAX
BARAX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
BARAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BARAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
BARAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
BARAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
BARAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) and Baron Asset Fund (BARAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMCGXBARAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.02

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

0.01

+0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

0.02

+1.45

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMCGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the BARAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMCGX and BARAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMCGX drawdown since its inception was -74.93%, which is greater than BARAX's maximum drawdown of -59.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMCGX and BARAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMCGXBARAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.93%

-59.71%

-15.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-16.75%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.65%

-17.82%

-8.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-64.50%

-37.53%

-26.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.50%

-37.53%

-26.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.04%

-15.54%

-18.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.92%

-11.41%

-11.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.23%

6.25%

-1.02%

Volatility

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund (AMCGX) is 5.19%, while Baron Asset Fund (BARAX) has a volatility of 6.09%. This indicates that AMCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BARAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMCGXBARAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.19%

6.09%

-0.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.96%

16.99%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.15%

20.91%

-0.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.58%

20.53%

+10.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.86%

20.23%

+6.63%

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMCGX has a 1.93% expense ratio, which is higher than BARAX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMCGX vs. BARAX - Dividend Comparison

AMCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BARAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.80%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMCGX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.34%13.72%10.98%7.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%
BARAX
Baron Asset Fund
11.80%11.51%19.23%3.48%0.01%7.65%3.05%1.78%7.42%7.25%4.88%11.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMCGX and BARAX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BARAX has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to AMCGX (5.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMCGX dropped -74.93% vs BARAX's -59.71%.

AMCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMCGX and BARAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer