AMBQ vs. CRUS

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

AMBQ (Ambiq Micro, Inc) and CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBQ achieves a 210.74% return, which is significantly higher than CRUS's 39.59% return.

AMBQ

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: 8.44%
• YTD: 210.74%
• 6M: 186.42%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CRUS

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -3.37%
• YTD: 39.59%
• 6M: 37.21%
• 1Y: 58.53%
• 3Y*: 30.86%
• 5Y*: 15.89%
• 10Y*: 15.92%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMBQ Ambiq Micro, Inc	210.74%	-25.00%
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc.	39.59%	12.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBQ and CRUS is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.25

Fundamentals

EPS AMBQ : -$3.17 CRUS : $7.84
PS Ratio AMBQ : 13.10 CRUS : 4.38
Total Revenue (TTM) AMBQ : $81.84M CRUS : $2.00B
Gross Profit (TTM) AMBQ : $28.20M CRUS : $1.05B
EBITDA (TTM) AMBQ : -$35.78M CRUS : $503.58M

Return for Risk

AMBQ vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CRUS

CRUS Risk / Return Rank: 83
CRUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CRUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
CRUS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
CRUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
CRUS Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMBQ	CRUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.65	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.17	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.29	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	3.69	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	9.27	—

Drawdowns

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBQ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBQ and CRUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMBQ	CRUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.10%	-97.48%	+49.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.94%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-46.85%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-46.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-55.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.12%	-7.54%	+5.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.84%	-52.69%	+27.85%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.33%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMBQ	CRUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	26.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	90.62%	35.78%	+54.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	90.62%	36.28%	+54.34%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	90.62%	40.26%	+50.36%

Dividends

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMBQ nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AMBQ vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambiq Micro, Inc and Cirrus Logic, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

AMBQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a gross profit of 10.89M and revenue of 25.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.

CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.

AMBQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported an operating income of -11.69M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.

AMBQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a net income of -10.17M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in a net margin of -40.6%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMBQ and CRUS in my portfolio?

AMBQ and CRUS have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.