AMBQ vs. CRUS
AMBQ (Ambiq Micro, Inc) and CRUS (Cirrus Logic, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past year, AMBQ returned 60.95% vs 26.71% for CRUS. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMBQ achieves a 123.12% return, which is significantly higher than CRUS's 9.16% return.
AMBQ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -23.25%
- 6M
- 109.25%
- YTD
- 123.12%
- 1Y
- 60.95%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 67.17%
CRUS
- 1D
- -1.90%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- 6M
- -0.76%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 10.29%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
AMBQ Ambiq Micro, Inc | $37.19M | $38.82M | $56.18M |
| $91.15M | $91.56M | $97.21M |
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMBQ Ambiq Micro, Inc | 123.12% | -25.00% |
CRUS Cirrus Logic, Inc. | 9.16% | 12.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMBQ and CRUS is 0.27, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
AMBQ:
$1.54B
CRUS:
$6.53B
AMBQ:
-$3.74
CRUS:
$7.86
AMBQ:
7.97
CRUS:
3.41
AMBQ:
$81.84M
CRUS:
$2.00B
AMBQ:
$28.20M
CRUS:
$1.05B
AMBQ:
-$35.78M
CRUS:
$503.58M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMBQ vs. CRUS — Risk / Return Rank
AMBQ
CRUS
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) and Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMBQ | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 1.03 | -0.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.72 | 3.11 | -1.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMBQ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum CRUS drawdown of -97.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBQ and CRUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMBQ | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.10% | -97.48% | +49.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.28% | -27.70% | -19.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -46.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.72% | -27.70% | -2.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -52.59% | +28.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.13% | 9.15% | +17.98% |
Volatility
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Volatility Comparison
Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) has a higher volatility of 27.82% compared to Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) at 9.78%. This indicates that AMBQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMBQ | CRUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.82% | 9.78% | +18.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 67.81% | 28.05% | +39.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 91.11% | 36.75% | +54.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 90.94% | 36.52% | +54.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 90.94% | 39.73% | +51.21% |
Dividends
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMBQ nor CRUS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambiq Micro, Inc and Cirrus Logic, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMBQ vs. CRUS - Profitability Comparison
AMBQ - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a gross profit of 10.89M and revenue of 25.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.
CRUS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 237.64M and revenue of 448.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.0%.
AMBQ - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported an operating income of -11.69M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.
CRUS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 90.30M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
AMBQ - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a net income of -10.17M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in a net margin of -40.6%.
CRUS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 81.81M and revenue of 448.52M, resulting in a net margin of 18.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMBQ and CRUS have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMBQ has higher volatility (27.82%) compared to CRUS (9.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBQ dropped -48.10% vs CRUS's -97.48%.
CRUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMBQ and CRUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer