PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRUS vs. SLAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRUSSLAB
YTD Return0.97%-10.18%
1Y Return-1.62%-15.02%
3Y Return (Ann)4.13%-5.55%
5Y Return (Ann)10.95%2.13%
10Y Return (Ann)14.09%10.30%
Sharpe Ratio-0.04-0.38
Daily Std Dev32.03%42.66%
Max Drawdown-97.48%-89.29%
Current Drawdown-23.33%-43.46%

Fundamentals


CRUSSLAB
Market Cap$4.77B$3.90B
EPS$3.16-$3.30
PE Ratio28.0270.57
PEG Ratio8.093.03
Revenue (TTM)$1.79B$641.85M
Gross Profit (TTM)$923.64M$642.56M
EBITDA (TTM)$381.73M-$41.01M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CRUS and SLAB is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CRUS vs. SLAB - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than SLAB's -10.18% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed SLAB with an annualized return of 14.09%, while SLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
302.40%
71.24%
CRUS
SLAB

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cirrus Logic, Inc.

Silicon Laboratories Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRUS vs. SLAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.13
SLAB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.38, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.38
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SLAB, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.97
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.28, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.28
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SLAB, currently valued at -0.68, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.68

CRUS vs. SLAB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the SLAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CRUS and SLAB.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.04
-0.38
CRUS
SLAB

Dividends

CRUS vs. SLAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRUS nor SLAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRUS vs. SLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than SLAB's maximum drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and SLAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-23.33%
-43.46%
CRUS
SLAB

Volatility

CRUS vs. SLAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 9.82%, while Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a volatility of 15.24%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%18.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.82%
15.24%
CRUS
SLAB

Financials

CRUS vs. SLAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items