CRUS vs. SLAB

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 20.95% return, which is significantly higher than SLAB's -7.14% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed SLAB with an annualized return of 16.07%, while SLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is higher than the SLAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRUS and SLAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CRUS nor SLAB has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than SLAB's maximum drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and SLAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 8.15%, while Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a volatility of 15.01%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.