PortfoliosLab logo
CRUS vs. SLAB
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRUS and SLAB is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CRUS vs. SLAB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRUS:

-0.08

SLAB:

-0.17

Sortino Ratio

CRUS:

0.65

SLAB:

0.16

Omega Ratio

CRUS:

1.09

SLAB:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

CRUS:

0.22

SLAB:

-0.12

Martin Ratio

CRUS:

0.44

SLAB:

-0.40

Ulcer Index

CRUS:

23.39%

SLAB:

18.04%

Daily Std Dev

CRUS:

41.84%

SLAB:

51.51%

Max Drawdown

CRUS:

-97.48%

SLAB:

-89.29%

Current Drawdown

CRUS:

-31.00%

SLAB:

-44.29%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRUS:

$5.34B

SLAB:

$3.80B

EPS

CRUS:

$6.00

SLAB:

-$5.93

PEG Ratio

CRUS:

8.09

SLAB:

3.03

PS Ratio

CRUS:

2.82

SLAB:

6.50

PB Ratio

CRUS:

2.64

SLAB:

3.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRUS:

$1.47B

SLAB:

$478.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRUS:

$769.30M

SLAB:

$251.04M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRUS:

$378.76M

SLAB:

-$61.23M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 0.95% return, which is significantly higher than SLAB's -5.77% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed SLAB with an annualized return of 10.87%, while SLAB has yielded a comparatively lower 8.49% annualized return.


CRUS

YTD

0.95%

1M

16.53%

6M

-3.07%

1Y

-5.28%

5Y*

7.83%

10Y*

10.87%

SLAB

YTD

-5.77%

1M

30.32%

6M

4.42%

1Y

-6.06%

5Y*

4.39%

10Y*

8.49%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRUS vs. SLAB — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRUS is 5454
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRUS is 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SLAB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SLAB is 4040
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SLAB is 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SLAB is 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SLAB is 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SLAB is 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SLAB is 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRUS vs. SLAB - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is higher than the SLAB Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRUS and SLAB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CRUS vs. SLAB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRUS nor SLAB has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRUS vs. SLAB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than SLAB's maximum drawdown of -89.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and SLAB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CRUS vs. SLAB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 9.87%, while Silicon Laboratories Inc. (SLAB) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLAB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CRUS vs. SLAB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00MAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
555.74M
166.25M
(CRUS) Total Revenue
(SLAB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRUS vs. SLAB - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Silicon Laboratories Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%65.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
53.6%
54.3%
(CRUS) Gross Margin
(SLAB) Gross Margin
CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 297.79M and revenue of 555.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.6%.

SLAB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a gross profit of 90.22M and revenue of 166.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.3%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 145.77M and revenue of 555.74M, resulting in an operating margin of 26.2%.

SLAB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported an operating income of -28.63M and revenue of 166.25M, resulting in an operating margin of -17.2%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 116.01M and revenue of 555.74M, resulting in a net margin of 20.9%.

SLAB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Silicon Laboratories Inc. reported a net income of -23.82M and revenue of 166.25M, resulting in a net margin of -14.3%.