PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRUS vs. LSCC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRUSLSCC
YTD Return21.01%-28.64%
1Y Return32.77%-16.43%
3Y Return (Ann)7.91%-16.68%
5Y Return (Ann)6.73%20.69%
10Y Return (Ann)18.63%22.30%
Sharpe Ratio0.84-0.36
Sortino Ratio1.45-0.19
Omega Ratio1.180.98
Calmar Ratio1.05-0.33
Martin Ratio3.31-0.72
Ulcer Index9.85%26.23%
Daily Std Dev38.63%52.20%
Max Drawdown-97.48%-97.34%
Current Drawdown-30.90%-49.38%

Fundamentals


CRUSLSCC
Market Cap$5.56B$7.29B
EPS$5.88$1.02
PE Ratio17.8051.77
PEG Ratio8.093.18
Total Revenue (TTM)$1.91B$562.58M
Gross Profit (TTM)$983.58M$360.06M
EBITDA (TTM)$440.10M$127.67M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between CRUS and LSCC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CRUS vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 21.01% return, which is significantly higher than LSCC's -28.64% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has underperformed LSCC with an annualized return of 18.63%, while LSCC has yielded a comparatively higher 22.30% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-40.00%-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-8.50%
-32.52%
CRUS
LSCC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRUS vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 0.84, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.000.84
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.45
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.05, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 3.31, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.003.31
LSCC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LSCC, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.33, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.33
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LSCC, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.72

CRUS vs. LSCC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the LSCC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRUS and LSCC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.84
-0.36
CRUS
LSCC

Dividends

CRUS vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRUS nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRUS vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and LSCC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-30.90%
-49.38%
CRUS
LSCC

Volatility

CRUS vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 11.89%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 13.24%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
11.89%
13.24%
CRUS
LSCC

Financials

CRUS vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items