PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CRUS vs. AMBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


CRUSAMBA
YTD Return0.97%-25.66%
1Y Return-1.62%-27.93%
3Y Return (Ann)4.13%-22.42%
5Y Return (Ann)10.95%-2.29%
10Y Return (Ann)14.09%6.31%
Sharpe Ratio-0.04-0.61
Daily Std Dev32.03%45.54%
Max Drawdown-97.48%-81.10%
Current Drawdown-23.33%-78.99%

Fundamentals


CRUSAMBA
Market Cap$4.77B$1.77B
EPS$3.16-$4.25
PE Ratio28.023.75
PEG Ratio8.094.97
Revenue (TTM)$1.79B$226.47M
Gross Profit (TTM)$923.64M$211.96M
EBITDA (TTM)$381.73M-$141.25M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between CRUS and AMBA is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

CRUS vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 0.97% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's -25.66% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 14.09%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 6.31% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
125.08%
651.82%
CRUS
AMBA

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Cirrus Logic, Inc.

Ambarella, Inc.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRUS vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CRUS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.04
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 0.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CRUS, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.03, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.03
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CRUS, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.13
AMBA
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for AMBA, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.500.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.34, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.34
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for AMBA, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.84

CRUS vs. AMBA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of CRUS and AMBA.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.04
-0.61
CRUS
AMBA

Dividends

CRUS vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRUS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRUS vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and AMBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-23.33%
-78.99%
CRUS
AMBA

Volatility

CRUS vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 9.82%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 11.80%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
9.82%
11.80%
CRUS
AMBA

Financials

CRUS vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items