PortfoliosLab logo
CRUS vs. AMBA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between CRUS and AMBA is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

CRUS vs. AMBA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

CRUS:

-0.13

AMBA:

0.53

Sortino Ratio

CRUS:

0.16

AMBA:

1.23

Omega Ratio

CRUS:

1.02

AMBA:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

CRUS:

-0.09

AMBA:

0.46

Martin Ratio

CRUS:

-0.17

AMBA:

1.72

Ulcer Index

CRUS:

23.69%

AMBA:

21.72%

Daily Std Dev

CRUS:

41.97%

AMBA:

61.91%

Max Drawdown

CRUS:

-97.48%

AMBA:

-81.65%

Current Drawdown

CRUS:

-27.08%

AMBA:

-70.71%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CRUS:

$5.68B

AMBA:

$2.66B

EPS

CRUS:

$6.00

AMBA:

-$2.84

PEG Ratio

CRUS:

8.09

AMBA:

4.97

PS Ratio

CRUS:

3.00

AMBA:

9.33

PB Ratio

CRUS:

2.91

AMBA:

4.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

CRUS:

$1.90B

AMBA:

$230.39M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CRUS:

$996.04M

AMBA:

$139.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

CRUS:

$464.71M

AMBA:

-$84.59M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 6.68% return, which is significantly higher than AMBA's -12.69% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 11.15%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower -2.72% annualized return.


CRUS

YTD

6.68%

1M

24.22%

6M

5.52%

1Y

-5.34%

5Y*

10.15%

10Y*

11.15%

AMBA

YTD

-12.69%

1M

45.67%

6M

11.58%

1Y

32.64%

5Y*

4.01%

10Y*

-2.72%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CRUS vs. AMBA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CRUS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CRUS is 4343
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CRUS is 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

AMBA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AMBA is 7171
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AMBA is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AMBA is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CRUS vs. AMBA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is -0.13, which is lower than the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRUS and AMBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

CRUS vs. AMBA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CRUS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CRUS vs. AMBA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and AMBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CRUS vs. AMBA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 7.91%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 13.85%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

CRUS vs. AMBA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20212022202320242025
424.46M
84.02M
(CRUS) Total Revenue
(AMBA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CRUS vs. AMBA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

50.0%55.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
53.4%
60.9%
(CRUS) Gross Margin
(AMBA) Gross Margin
CRUS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a gross profit of 226.74M and revenue of 424.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.4%.

AMBA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambarella, Inc. reported a gross profit of 51.14M and revenue of 84.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.9%.

CRUS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported an operating income of 85.95M and revenue of 424.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

AMBA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambarella, Inc. reported an operating income of -25.35M and revenue of 84.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -30.2%.

CRUS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cirrus Logic, Inc. reported a net income of 71.27M and revenue of 424.46M, resulting in a net margin of 16.8%.

AMBA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Ambarella, Inc. reported a net income of -20.23M and revenue of 84.02M, resulting in a net margin of -24.1%.