CRUS vs. AMBA

In the year-to-date period, CRUS achieves a 2.34% return, which is significantly lower than AMBA's 4.70% return. Over the past 10 years, CRUS has outperformed AMBA with an annualized return of 15.61%, while AMBA has yielded a comparatively lower 3.05% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) and Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current CRUS Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is comparable to the AMBA Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CRUS and AMBA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither CRUS nor AMBA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum CRUS drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than AMBA's maximum drawdown of -81.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CRUS and AMBA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Cirrus Logic, Inc. (CRUS) is 7.52%, while Ambarella, Inc. (AMBA) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that CRUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cirrus Logic, Inc. and Ambarella, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.