PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBQ vs. CEVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) and CEVA, Inc. (CEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBQ achieves a 210.74% return, which is significantly higher than CEVA's 124.95% return.


AMBQ

1D
-2.12%
1M
8.44%
YTD
210.74%
6M
186.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CEVA

1D
-2.63%
1M
22.77%
YTD
124.95%
6M
124.02%
1Y
134.54%
3Y*
27.73%
5Y*
1.84%
10Y*
6.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AMBQ
Ambiq Micro, Inc
210.74%-25.00%
CEVA
CEVA, Inc.
124.95%-6.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBQ and CEVA is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.50

Fundamentals

EPS

AMBQ:

-$3.17

CEVA:

-$0.47

PS Ratio

AMBQ:

13.10

CEVA:

10.89

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMBQ:

$81.84M

CEVA:

$112.38M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMBQ:

$28.20M

CEVA:

$97.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMBQ:

-$35.78M

CEVA:

-$5.96M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBQ vs. CEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CEVA
CEVA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
CEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ambiq Micro, Inc (AMBQ) and CEVA, Inc. (CEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMBQCEVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.37

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBQ drawdown since its inception was -48.10%, smaller than the maximum CEVA drawdown of -78.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBQ and CEVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBQCEVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.10%

-78.24%

+30.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.12%

-34.68%

+32.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.84%

-38.61%

+13.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

21.19%

Volatility

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBQCEVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.62%

64.15%

+26.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.62%

54.51%

+36.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.62%

51.07%

+39.55%

Dividends

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMBQ nor CEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ambiq Micro, Inc and CEVA, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00M20.00M25.00M30.00M35.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
25.06M
27.02M
(AMBQ) Total Revenue
(CEVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMBQ vs. CEVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ambiq Micro, Inc and CEVA, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
43.5%
86.2%
Portfolio components
AMBQ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a gross profit of 10.89M and revenue of 25.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.5%.

CEVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a gross profit of 23.30M and revenue of 27.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.2%.

AMBQ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported an operating income of -11.69M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -46.6%.

CEVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported an operating income of -4.97M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -18.4%.

AMBQ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ambiq Micro, Inc reported a net income of -10.17M and revenue of 25.06M, resulting in a net margin of -40.6%.

CEVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CEVA, Inc. reported a net income of -4.46M and revenue of 27.02M, resulting in a net margin of -16.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMBQ and CEVA have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBQ and CEVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer