PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBFX vs. QBDSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBFX achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than QBDSX's 0.25% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBFX has outperformed QBDSX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while QBDSX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.81% annualized return.


AMBFX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.70%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.47%

QBDSX

1D
0.13%
1M
0.38%
YTD
0.25%
6M
-0.08%
1Y
2.01%
3Y*
3.03%
5Y*
0.80%
10Y*
0.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
10.06%18.67%15.25%13.81%-11.93%16.00%11.06%19.45%-2.69%14.85%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
0.25%5.11%1.02%2.25%-4.09%-0.66%-9.22%10.50%-3.17%5.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBFX and QBDSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.45

The correlation between AMBFX and QBDSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (5 years) to 0.64 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBFX vs. QBDSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBFX
AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

QBDSX
QBDSX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
QBDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
QBDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBFXQBDSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.10

+0.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

0.65

+3.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.73

1.83

+14.90

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is higher than the QBDSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBFX and QBDSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMBFXQBDSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

0.56

+2.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.19

+0.77

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.15

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.16

+0.61

Drawdowns

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBFX drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, which is greater than QBDSX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBFX and QBDSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBFXQBDSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-18.38%

-16.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-3.09%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.64%

-3.76%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-7.40%

-11.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-18.38%

-3.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.83%

+7.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-6.85%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.10%

+0.44%

Volatility

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to Quantified Managed Income Fund (QBDSX) at 0.68%. This indicates that AMBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QBDSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBFXQBDSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

0.68%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

2.39%

+4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

3.59%

+5.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.50%

4.32%

+6.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

5.25%

+5.42%

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMBFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QBDSX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMBFX vs. QBDSX - Dividend Comparison

AMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than QBDSX's 4.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
7.72%8.47%7.40%2.20%2.52%4.50%4.56%4.19%6.20%4.85%4.46%5.81%
QBDSX
Quantified Managed Income Fund
4.46%4.47%3.98%4.51%0.54%0.71%0.87%2.26%2.04%2.51%1.00%3.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMBFX and QBDSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBFX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to QBDSX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBFX dropped -35.05% vs QBDSX's -18.38%.

AMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBFX and QBDSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer