PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBFX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBFX achieves a 9.80% return, which is significantly higher than PRWCX's 6.04% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBFX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.28% annualized return.


AMBFX

1D
0.20%
1M
3.59%
YTD
9.80%
6M
10.73%
1Y
25.43%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
10.45%

PRWCX

1D
-0.16%
1M
2.76%
YTD
6.04%
6M
6.29%
1Y
15.64%
3Y*
13.58%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
9.80%18.67%15.25%13.81%-11.93%16.00%11.06%19.45%-2.69%14.85%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
6.04%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBFX and PRWCX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.92

The correlation between AMBFX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBFX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBFX
AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBFXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.98

2.14

+0.85

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.17

3.05

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.40

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.72

2.55

+1.17

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.88

11.23

+5.65

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBFX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMBFXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.98

2.14

+0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.70

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.89

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.91

-0.14

Drawdowns

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBFX drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBFX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBFXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-41.77%

+6.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-6.32%

-0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.64%

-15.96%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-17.07%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-26.86%

+4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.16%

+0.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-3.33%

-0.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.44%

+0.10%

Volatility

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) has a higher volatility of 2.67% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.87%. This indicates that AMBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBFXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

1.87%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.87%

6.03%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.74%

7.46%

+1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.50%

12.74%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

12.74%

-2.07%

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMBFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMBFX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

AMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, less than PRWCX's 8.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
7.74%8.47%7.40%2.20%2.52%4.50%4.56%4.19%6.20%4.85%4.46%5.81%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.31%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMBFX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMBFX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to PRWCX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBFX dropped -35.05% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

AMBFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBFX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer