PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMBFX vs. EKBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMBFX achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly lower than EKBAX's 36.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AMBFX has underperformed EKBAX with an annualized return of 10.47%, while EKBAX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.54% annualized return.


AMBFX

1D
0.24%
1M
4.00%
YTD
10.06%
6M
10.70%
1Y
25.21%
3Y*
17.77%
5Y*
9.94%
10Y*
10.47%

EKBAX

1D
3.04%
1M
13.03%
YTD
36.56%
6M
36.64%
1Y
65.31%
3Y*
32.33%
5Y*
19.50%
10Y*
16.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
10.06%18.67%15.25%13.81%-11.93%16.00%11.06%19.45%-2.69%14.85%
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
36.56%21.87%21.75%22.23%-13.47%19.61%12.66%32.99%-5.55%14.43%

Correlation

The correlation between AMBFX and EKBAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2008

0.89

The correlation between AMBFX and EKBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMBFX vs. EKBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMBFX
AMBFX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
AMBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

EKBAX
EKBAX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EKBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EKBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
EKBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
EKBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
EKBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) and Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMBFXEKBAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.96

4.13

-1.17

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.14

5.13

-0.98

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.72

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

9.28

-5.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.73

39.09

-22.36

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the EKBAX Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMBFX and EKBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMBFXEKBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.96

4.13

-1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

1.08

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

0.94

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.52

+0.26

Drawdowns

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMBFX drawdown since its inception was -35.05%, smaller than the maximum EKBAX drawdown of -55.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMBFX and EKBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMBFXEKBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.05%

-55.64%

+20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-7.32%

+0.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.64%

-23.55%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.65%

-24.84%

+6.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

-32.33%

+10.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.58%

-7.98%

+4.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

1.74%

-0.20%

Volatility

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2 (AMBFX) is 2.67%, while Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund (EKBAX) has a volatility of 6.58%. This indicates that AMBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMBFXEKBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

6.58%

-3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

13.03%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.73%

16.45%

-7.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.50%

18.16%

-7.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.67%

17.58%

-6.91%

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMBFX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than EKBAX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMBFX vs. EKBAX - Dividend Comparison

AMBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.72%, more than EKBAX's 7.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMBFX
American Funds American Balanced Fund® Class F-2
7.72%8.47%7.40%2.20%2.52%4.50%4.56%4.19%6.20%4.85%4.46%5.81%
EKBAX
Allspring Diversified Capital Builder Fund
7.05%9.61%5.28%6.16%12.50%6.89%2.03%9.49%7.14%6.20%10.05%11.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMBFX and EKBAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EKBAX has higher volatility (6.58%) compared to AMBFX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMBFX dropped -35.05% vs EKBAX's -55.64%.

EKBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMBFX and EKBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer