PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMAX vs. RYSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AMAX vs. RYSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AMAX vs. RYSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
0.90%11.38%9.62%2.13%
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
2.52%-3.09%12.46%9.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than RYSE's 2.52% return.


AMAX

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
0.90%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*

RYSE

1D
0.00%
1M
6.60%
YTD
2.52%
6M
6.84%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AMAX vs. RYSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than RYSE's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AMAX vs. RYSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

RYSE
RYSE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RYSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. RYSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMAXRYSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.50

+0.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

0.81

+1.01

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.09

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.08

0.52

+1.55

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.57

1.07

+5.50

AMAX vs. RYSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the RYSE Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and RYSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMAXRYSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.50

+0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.43

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and RYSE is -0.26. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

AMAX vs. RYSE - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.50%, more than RYSE's 1.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.50%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
1.37%1.86%2.58%24.91%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. RYSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, smaller than the maximum RYSE drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and RYSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AMAXRYSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-19.70%

+3.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.53%

-8.23%

+0.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.39%

-7.83%

+2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-9.25%

+3.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.38%

4.04%

-1.66%

Volatility

AMAX vs. RYSE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) is 3.97%, while Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) has a volatility of 4.63%. This indicates that AMAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AMAXRYSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

4.63%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

8.01%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

12.68%

-1.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.38%

15.32%

-4.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.38%

15.32%

-4.94%