PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RYSE vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RYSE vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RYSE vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
2.52%-3.09%12.46%-9.60%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
-4.82%14.96%7.70%7.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RYSE achieves a 2.52% return, which is significantly higher than QQQY's -4.82% return.


RYSE

1D
0.00%
1M
6.60%
YTD
2.52%
6M
6.84%
1Y
6.25%
3Y*
6.72%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
1.19%
1M
-3.30%
YTD
-4.82%
6M
-3.93%
1Y
14.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RYSE vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

RYSE has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RYSE vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RYSE
RYSE Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
RYSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RYSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RYSE Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
RYSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RYSE Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RYSE vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RYSEQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.81

1.16

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.18

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.52

1.44

-0.92

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.07

4.79

-3.72

RYSE vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RYSE Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RYSE and QQQY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RYSEQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

0.91

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.66

-0.23

Correlation

The correlation between RYSE and QQQY is -0.06. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

RYSE vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

RYSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than QQQY's 44.97% yield.


TTM202520242023
RYSE
Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF
1.37%1.86%2.58%24.91%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
44.97%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Drawdowns

RYSE vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RYSE drawdown since its inception was -19.70%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQY drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RYSE and QQQY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RYSEQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.70%

-19.05%

-0.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.23%

-11.30%

+3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.83%

-7.05%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-3.04%

-6.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.04%

3.40%

+0.64%

Volatility

RYSE vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cboe Vest 10 Year Interest Rate Hedge ETF (RYSE) is 4.63%, while Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) has a volatility of 6.38%. This indicates that RYSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RYSEQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.63%

6.38%

-1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.01%

11.21%

-3.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

16.45%

-3.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

14.68%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.32%

14.68%

+0.64%