AMAX vs. ILS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

AMAX (RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both Nontraditional Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMAX returned 12.42% vs 7.62% for ILS. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. AMAX charges 1.29%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

AMAX vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMAX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than ILS's 1.76% return.

AMAX

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 6M: 3.96%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 2.03%
• 1Y: 7.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMAX vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	4.98%	13.82%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	1.76%	5.60%

Correlation

The correlation between AMAX and ILS is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2025	-0.08

Return for Risk

AMAX vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMAX

AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 34
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 92
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 92
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMAX vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMAX	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.26	2.77	-1.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.76	4.53	-2.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.61	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.79	10.74	-8.95
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.33	35.99	-30.66
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMAX vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.26, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMAX and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMAX	ILS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.26	2.77	-1.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.89	-1.50

Drawdowns

AMAX vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMAX drawdown since its inception was -16.28%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -1.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAX and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMAX	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.28%	-1.56%	-14.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-0.55%	-6.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	0.00%	-1.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.32%	-0.26%	-5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.53%	0.17%	+2.36%

Volatility

AMAX vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a higher volatility of 2.32% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.88%. This indicates that AMAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMAX	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.32%	0.88%	+1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.02%	1.69%	+6.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.95%	3.19%	+6.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.36%	3.39%	+6.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.36%	3.39%	+6.97%

AMAX vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMAX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMAX vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

AMAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.94%, more than ILS's 8.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
AMAX RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF	10.94%	9.18%	7.36%	6.99%	11.22%	1.00%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.09%	6.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMAX and ILS in my portfolio?

AMAX and ILS have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMAX or ILS?

AMAX has higher volatility (2.32%) compared to ILS (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAX dropped -16.28% vs ILS's -1.56%.

Which ETF is better, AMAX or ILS?

On 1-year performance, AMAX leads with 12.42% vs 7.62% for ILS. On fees, AMAX is cheaper at 1.29% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMAX or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, AMAX has performed better with a 12.42% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMAX or ILS?

AMAX is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMAX or ILS?

AMAX has the higher dividend yield at 10.94%, compared with 8.09% for ILS.

What is the main difference between AMAX and ILS?

They also come from different issuers: Adaptive and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for AMAX and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.