AMAT vs. VRT
AMAT (Applied Materials, Inc.) and VRT (Vertiv Holdings Co.) are both stocks. AMAT operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while VRT operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, AMAT returned 34.02%/yr vs 63.29%/yr for VRT. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMAT vs. VRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAT achieves a 121.28% return, which is significantly higher than VRT's 86.99% return.
AMAT
- 1D
- 2.64%
- 1M
- 30.08%
- YTD
- 121.28%
- 6M
- 119.38%
- 1Y
- 234.96%
- 3Y*
- 60.05%
- 5Y*
- 34.02%
- 10Y*
- 38.86%
VRT
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -18.35%
- YTD
- 86.99%
- 6M
- 87.85%
- 1Y
- 173.26%
- 3Y*
- 138.33%
- 5Y*
- 63.29%
- 10Y*
- —
AMAT vs. VRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 121.28% | 59.60% | 1.13% | 67.97% | -37.54% | 83.64% | 43.29% | 89.86% | -31.52% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 86.99% | 42.80% | 136.82% | 251.81% | -45.25% | 33.80% | 69.36% | 12.55% | 1.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAT and VRT is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2018 | 0.46 |
The correlation between AMAT and VRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.58 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AMAT:
$453.23B
VRT:
$118.76B
AMAT:
$10.61
VRT:
$3.99
AMAT:
53.45
VRT:
75.98
AMAT:
6.80
VRT:
0.33
AMAT:
15.67
VRT:
10.92
AMAT:
18.96
VRT:
27.98
AMAT:
$29.02B
VRT:
$10.84B
AMAT:
$14.21B
VRT:
$3.92B
AMAT:
$9.92B
VRT:
$2.35B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMAT vs. VRT — Risk / Return Rank
AMAT
VRT
AMAT vs. VRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) and Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMAT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.41 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.67 | 6.55 | +4.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.41 | 17.79 | +12.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMAT vs. VRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAT drawdown since its inception was -85.22%, which is greater than VRT's maximum drawdown of -71.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAT and VRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.22% | -71.24% | -13.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.37% | -25.32% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.88% | -61.28% | +11.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.14% | -71.24% | +16.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.14% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -19.50% | +19.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.78% | -16.23% | -22.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.49% | 9.30% | -1.81% |
Volatility
AMAT vs. VRT - Volatility Comparison
Applied Materials, Inc. (AMAT) has a higher volatility of 20.52% compared to Vertiv Holdings Co. (VRT) at 16.12%. This indicates that AMAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMAT | VRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.52% | 16.12% | +4.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.83% | 45.82% | -6.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.03% | 58.29% | -9.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.20% | 61.88% | -17.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.94% | 54.61% | -11.67% |
Dividends
AMAT vs. VRT - Dividend Comparison
AMAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than VRT's 0.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAT Applied Materials, Inc. | 0.34% | 0.69% | 0.93% | 0.75% | 1.05% | 0.60% | 1.01% | 1.36% | 2.14% | 0.78% | 1.24% | 2.14% |
VRT Vertiv Holdings Co. | 0.07% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AMAT vs. VRT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Applied Materials, Inc. and Vertiv Holdings Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AMAT vs. VRT - Profitability Comparison
AMAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.95B and revenue of 7.91B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.9%.
VRT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a gross profit of 999.70M and revenue of 2.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 37.7%.
AMAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported an operating income of 2.52B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.9%.
VRT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported an operating income of 440.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
AMAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Applied Materials, Inc. reported a net income of 2.81B and revenue of 7.91B, resulting in a net margin of 35.5%.
VRT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vertiv Holdings Co. reported a net income of 390.10M and revenue of 2.65B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAT and VRT have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMAT has higher volatility (20.52%) compared to VRT (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAT dropped -85.22% vs VRT's -71.24%.
AMAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.65 vs 2.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMAT and VRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer