AMAL vs. IPSC
AMAL (Amalgamated Financial Corp.) and IPSC (Century Therapeutics, Inc.) are both stocks. AMAL operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services), while IPSC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, AMAL returned 28.65%/yr vs -41.37%/yr for IPSC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMAL vs. IPSC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMAL achieves a 55.47% return, which is significantly lower than IPSC's 103.06% return.
AMAL
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 28.21%
- YTD
- 55.47%
- 1Y
- 76.42%
- 3Y*
- 38.78%
- 5Y*
- 28.65%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 17.28%
IPSC
- 1D
- -7.76%
- 1M
- -16.87%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- YTD
- 103.06%
- 1Y
- 279.77%
- 3Y*
- -12.55%
- 5Y*
- -41.37%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -35.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.33M | $7.67M | $6.82M | |
| $1.42M | $2.12M | $2.88M |
AMAL vs. IPSC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp. | 55.47% | -2.50% | 26.32% | 19.44% | 39.78% | 9.09% |
IPSC Century Therapeutics, Inc. | 103.06% | -1.50% | -69.58% | -35.28% | -67.65% | -18.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMAL and IPSC is 0.20, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
AMAL:
$1.47B
IPSC:
$174.87M
AMAL:
$3.75
IPSC:
-$0.88
AMAL:
1.79
IPSC:
1.48
AMAL:
$485.42M
IPSC:
$0.00
AMAL:
$338.80M
IPSC:
-$9.88M
AMAL:
$156.66M
IPSC:
-$103.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMAL vs. IPSC — Risk / Return Rank
AMAL
IPSC
AMAL vs. IPSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) and Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMAL | IPSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.42 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.64 | 7.32 | -2.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.36 | 14.90 | -1.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMAL vs. IPSC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMAL drawdown since its inception was -62.93%, smaller than the maximum IPSC drawdown of -98.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMAL and IPSC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMAL | IPSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.93% | -98.78% | +35.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.91% | -36.98% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -32.85% | -92.68% | +59.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.88% | -98.78% | +51.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.02% | -93.67% | +92.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.60% | -80.81% | +61.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.53% | 18.14% | -12.61% |
Volatility
AMAL vs. IPSC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amalgamated Financial Corp. (AMAL) is 7.43%, while Century Therapeutics, Inc. (IPSC) has a volatility of 16.98%. This indicates that AMAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMAL | IPSC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 16.98% | -9.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.05% | 51.48% | -32.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.77% | 97.17% | -67.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.86% | 83.40% | -49.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.78% | 83.64% | -43.86% |
Dividends
AMAL vs. IPSC - Dividend Comparison
AMAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, while IPSC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMAL Amalgamated Financial Corp. | 1.26% | 1.75% | 1.37% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.91% | 2.33% | 1.34% | 0.31% |
IPSC Century Therapeutics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AMAL vs. IPSC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amalgamated Financial Corp. and Century Therapeutics, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
AMAL and IPSC have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPSC has higher volatility (16.98%) compared to AMAL (7.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMAL dropped -62.93% vs IPSC's -98.78%.
IPSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMAL and IPSC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer