ALZFX vs. IWF
Compare and contrast key facts about Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF).
ALZFX is an actively managed fund by Alger. It was launched on Nov 8, 1993. IWF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on May 22, 2000.
Performance
ALZFX vs. IWF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ALZFX vs. IWF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZFX Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z | -13.58% | 40.08% | 52.22% | 44.63% | -35.75% | 20.37% | 46.19% | 34.29% | 1.68% | 29.12% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | -9.83% | 18.33% | 33.12% | 42.59% | -29.31% | 27.43% | 38.25% | 35.86% | -1.67% | 29.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ALZFX achieves a -13.58% return, which is significantly lower than IWF's -9.83% return. Over the past 10 years, ALZFX has outperformed IWF with an annualized return of 18.62%, while IWF has yielded a comparatively lower 16.53% annualized return.
ALZFX
- 1D
- -1.70%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- -13.58%
- 6M
- -14.05%
- 1Y
- 36.44%
- 3Y*
- 32.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.05%
- 10Y*
- 18.62%
IWF
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -5.20%
- YTD
- -9.83%
- 6M
- -8.80%
- 1Y
- 18.54%
- 3Y*
- 21.01%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ALZFX vs. IWF - Expense Ratio Comparison
ALZFX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than IWF's 0.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ALZFX vs. IWF — Risk / Return Rank
ALZFX
IWF
ALZFX vs. IWF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ALZFX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.91 | 1.35 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.19 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.15 | +0.73 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.44 | 3.95 | +2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ALZFX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.83 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 | 0.79 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.36 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between ALZFX and IWF is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ALZFX vs. IWF - Dividend Comparison
ALZFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.72%, more than IWF's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALZFX Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z | 8.72% | 7.53% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 0.10% | 13.63% | 6.16% | 2.21% | 5.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.36% | 0.46% | 0.67% | 0.91% | 0.49% | 0.66% | 0.99% | 1.27% | 1.10% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
Drawdowns
ALZFX vs. IWF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ALZFX drawdown since its inception was -43.22%, smaller than the maximum IWF drawdown of -64.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALZFX and IWF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ALZFX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.22% | -64.25% | +21.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -16.27% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.22% | -32.72% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.22% | -32.72% | -10.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -13.12% | -4.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.60% | -22.21% | +14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 4.74% | +0.35% |
Volatility
ALZFX vs. IWF - Volatility Comparison
Alger Focus Equity Fund Class Z (ALZFX) has a higher volatility of 7.56% compared to iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF) at 6.74%. This indicates that ALZFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ALZFX | IWF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.56% | 6.74% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 12.36% | +4.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.14% | 22.40% | +4.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.99% | 21.41% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 20.92% | +2.88% |